Guys,
any of you have wide implementation of CLNS? need your advice!
im using a completely separate and distinct routing protocol for each
network protocol (OSI and TCP/IP) so that the multiple routing
protocols essentially exist independently(ships-in-the-night).
Currently there is a widely deployment of OSPF/RIP/EIGRP in our
network along with IS-IS for CLNS(FTAM applications).
Rightnow there is a provision in our network to use Juniper router in
the core network. I have heard that Juniper does not support CLNS?
Correct me if im wrong! that is why we were going to implement CLNS
over GRE TUNNEL! WHAT'S THE IMPLICATION OF THIS SOLUTION? IS IT RIGHT
TO USE TUNNEL TO TRANSPORT CLNS? OR ships-in-the-night approach is
much more reliable than tunnel? co'z i can't imagine how many tunnel
we will going to create the network. ANY KNOWN SOLUTION?
rgds,
rreyes
CCIE#8673
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:11:56 EDT