Re: Source routing

From: Lars Fenneberg (lf@elemental.net)
Date: Wed Jan 23 2002 - 16:48:41 EST


Hi Robert!

Quoting Robert J. Adams (radams@siscom.net):

> I'm currently using a routing policy to force anything from 209.251.30.20
> to next-hop "Sprint", and anything from 209.251.30.21 to next-hop "UUnet".
> Once we got up to about 60Meg/sec on a 300Mhz VXR I'm at around 80% CPU.
> Is there a better way of doing this? See below for our current config.

        Your PBR is currently fast-switched. You could try switching to
        Netflow based PBR:

        ip cef [distributed]
        ip flow-cache feature-accelerate
        interface XXXXXX
         ip route-cache flow
         ip policy route-map YYYYYY

Cheers,
Lars.

-- 
Lars Fenneberg, lf@elemental.net (private), lf@mcs-cityline.net (work)



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:13:29 EDT