Re: [nsp] Rip route does not appear

From: kouji.baba@equant.com
Date: Mon Mar 11 2002 - 20:22:26 EST


Andrey,

Do you mean static route should be like this?

ip route 172.16.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0

I can not find any reason or other sample config.
Could you point to some documents?

Thanks,
-----
Kouji Baba

                                                                                                                                     
                    "Andrey
                    Kostin" To: <kouji.baba@equant.com>, <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
                    <ankost@east.r cc:
                    u> Subject: Re: [nsp] Rip route does not appear
                                                                                                                                     
                    2002/03/11
                    18:48
                    Please respond
                    to "Andrey
                    Kostin"
                                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                     

----- Original Message -----
From: <kouji.baba@equant.com>
To: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
Sent: 11 марта 2002 г. 11:12
Subject: [nsp] Rip route does not appear

> router rip
> redistribute static
> network 172.16.0.0
> network 192.168.128.0
> !
> ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.253.1 200
> ip route 172.16.0.0 0.0.255.255 0.0.0.0
                                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^
You have to use normal, non-wildcard-bit mask here.
---------------
Andrey Kostin
East Connection ISP, Moscow, Russia. http://www.east.ru

>
> Normally, it receives 0.0.0.0 route by RIP from 172.16.255.1.
> And R3 and R4 receives 172.16.0.0/16(auto summarized) from R2.
>
> When Ethernet0/0 protocol goes down, 172.16.0.0/16 is not appear even
> ISDN backup connection established.
> But, once I add a 24bit prefix network as static route, for example,
> ip route 172.16.25.0 0.0.0.255 0.0.0.0
> R3 and R4 gets route 172.16.0.0/16.
>
> Is it bug of IOS?
>
> -----
> Kouji Baba
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:13:36 EDT