Re: PIM-SM and NAT

From: Gert Doering (gert@greenie.muc.de)
Date: Fri Apr 26 2002 - 08:45:28 EDT


Hi,

On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 01:40:28PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 01:08:59PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
> > Soooo... any hints?
>
> Additional info: CCO claims "it will just work" (since 12.0T).
>
> I assumed that the problem has to do with "access-list 170" excluding
> the packets generated by the router itself, and added:
>
> access-list 170 permit ip any any

... which was a bad idea, because it meant the router NATted its own
outgoing PIM JOIN packets, which completely broke *incoming* multicast
streams. So reverted that (and incoming started to work again).

> My next try will be ("TAC answer") to upgrade to 12.1(14) and see whether
> this will cure the problem. 12.2(x) isn't possible due to flash memory
> constraints.

12.1(14) didn't change anything, the session is still registered as
(172.30.1.153, 224.2.188.149).

Now I'm out of ideas to try...

gert

-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert.doering@physik.tu-muenchen.de



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:13:42 EDT