Re: [nsp] To S or not to S?

From: Eric Osborne (eosborne@cisco.com)
Date: Tue Jul 02 2002 - 18:35:02 EDT


On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 11:59:30PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 05:50:41PM -0400, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> > Is the S-train still recommended for an ISP not needing an abundance of
> > fancy features? I'm not convinced 12.2 is worth it yet as long as I can
> > still get security fixes... Just BGP, OSPF, 802.1q VLANs and ssh, that's
> > all we require.
>
> Well - 12.0S is very good. Haven't had any exposure to 12.2S (is it
> publically available already?) so I can't comment on that.

not publicly availble yet....dare I say, not even privately
available.

I think the comparison was between 12.2M/12.2T and 12.0S. I agree
that 12.0S is probably a better choice given the features here.

eric

>
> Your list of requirements should be fulfillable with 12.0S just fine.
>
> gert
> --
> USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
> //www.muc.de/~gert/
> Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert@greenie.muc.de
> fax: +49-89-35655025 gert.doering@physik.tu-muenchen.de



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:13:48 EDT