RE: [nsp] BGP Multihome

From: George Robbins (grr@shandakor.tharsis.com)
Date: Thu Aug 24 2000 - 19:20:50 EDT


What liability? 8-)

Seriously, if the customer is only multi-homing with you, then there
no big difference between you annoucing a route for them and you're
announcing a route heard from them. In both cases it shows up with
an origin of your AS and in both cases you could have it vanish into
an aggregate route for your ISP.

Our general policy is that if the customer can qualify for their own
AS, they should get one, otherwise we do it with a private AS. There's
really no hassle in getting an AS number, you just need to be able to
say you're multi-homing with two different ISP's. Usually, it comes
down to a don't want to spend money issue. 8-(

                                                        George

> Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 18:10:53 -0400
> X-From_: cmartin@gnilink.net Thu Aug 24 18:10:53 2000
> Received-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 18:10:53 -0400
> From: "Martin, Christian" <cmartin@gnilink.net>
> To: "'Bill Manning'" <bmanning@ISI.EDU>, OZhang@tsibroadband.net
> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: [nsp] BGP Multihome
>
> >% since we will be liable
> >% for their problems if we do so. Has anyone come across this problem.
> >% If so, how do you resolved it ?
> >%
> >% -Ou Zhang
> >%
> >
> > Private ASNs.
> >
>
> The routes would still be originated from Ou's AS. This doesn't help
> obviate liability.
>
> chris
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:15 EDT