RE: [nsp] Multi-Homing without BGP

From: Vijay Gill (vijay@umbc.edu)
Date: Fri Oct 13 2000 - 12:22:17 EDT


On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Mark Borchers wrote:

> Didn't you mean that the other way around?
> Where:
> 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1
>
> is a true static route. In the event of link failure for any
> reason it will be withdrawn from the table.
>
> Whereas
> 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Serial0
> is treated as a connected route and will remain in the routing
> table no matter what kind of tumult may be occurring on the link.

If the link goes down, the static will be removed.

/vijay



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:18 EDT