Hi Vinod,
I think you should consider reading a few documents available here:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/459/18.html
In particular, "BGP Path Selection Crietria".
Hope that helps.
On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 02:40:31PM +0530, Vinod Anthony Joseph Cherunni wrote:
>
> Dear Paul,
>
> Thanks a lot for the advice, One thing is still unclear in regard to the
> Local preference.
>
> Assuming I have two circuits to the NAP, One ciruit originating from my
> border router in Virginia, & the other from another border router in
> california, Also stating that both the border routers of mine are connected
> using IBGP internally. Now if I set a local preference for a particular
> prefix to say 200 on both my border routers, Will some sort of load
> balancing happen, or else will traffic originating from Virginia exit using
> the Virginia border router, & vice versa wherein the internal IGP costs are
> calculated while traffic exits.
>
> Can I set local preferences between IBGP Peers? Defining it at transit
> routers that are not directly connected to external peers.
>
> Kindly advice
>
> With warm regards,
> Vinod.
>
---end quoted text---
-- CCNP,CCDP (R&S) Dmitri E. Kalintsev CDPlayer@irc Chief of Network Operations @ Sonorous Networks dek @ hades.uz phone: +27 11-327-1524 fax: 327-7648 http://hades.uz UIN:7150410 cell +27 82-336-1033
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:22 EDT