Re: SRP/DPT (was: Re: [nsp] GE switch)

From: Martin Cooper (mjc@cooper.org.uk)
Date: Thu Dec 07 2000 - 08:09:26 EST

Next message: Neil J. McRae: "Re: SRP/DPT (was: Re: [nsp] GE switch)"
Previous message: Vinod Anthony Joseph Cherunni: "Re: [nsp] REG: BGP Attributes"
Maybe in reply to: Mikael Abrahamsson: "SRP/DPT (was: Re: [nsp] GE switch)"
Next in thread: Neil J. McRae: "Re: SRP/DPT (was: Re: [nsp] GE switch)"
Reply: Neil J. McRae: "Re: SRP/DPT (was: Re: [nsp] GE switch)"
Reply: Scott Whyte: "Re: SRP/DPT (was: Re: [nsp] GE switch)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> writes:

> Does anyone know any vendors apart from Cisco that
> supports/say they will support in the near future
> the STM-16 SRP/DPT protocol? What about STM-64-SRP?

As I understand it, SRP is a Cisco proprietory protocol,
although I have heard tell of work on an IETF standard.

Next message: Neil J. McRae: "Re: SRP/DPT (was: Re: [nsp] GE switch)"
Previous message: Vinod Anthony Joseph Cherunni: "Re: [nsp] REG: BGP Attributes"
Maybe in reply to: Mikael Abrahamsson: "SRP/DPT (was: Re: [nsp] GE switch)"
Next in thread: Neil J. McRae: "Re: SRP/DPT (was: Re: [nsp] GE switch)"
Reply: Neil J. McRae: "Re: SRP/DPT (was: Re: [nsp] GE switch)"
Reply: Scott Whyte: "Re: SRP/DPT (was: Re: [nsp] GE switch)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:22 EDT