Re:RE: [nsp] ospf and bgp design question

From: rkuhljr@uol.com.br
Date: Sun Feb 11 2001 - 16:44:29 EST

Next message: Frank Bruce: "RE: RE: [nsp] ospf and bgp design question"
Previous message: Basil Dolmatov: "Re: [nsp] CEF, BGP tables and memory"
Maybe in reply to: Frank Bruce: "RE: [nsp] ospf and bgp design question"
Next in thread: Frank Bruce: "RE: RE: [nsp] ospf and bgp design question"
Reply: Frank Bruce: "RE: RE: [nsp] ospf and bgp design question"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

>Look at IS-IS as an IGP, the TE features for MPLS are interesting, the IS-IS
>IGP has been seen to scale to more routers per level, and the processing
>overhead is less than that of OSPF.

It seems that 12.1(E) IOS for Cat6K have more caveats with IS-IS than with OSPF...

Rubens Kuhl Jr.

Next message: Frank Bruce: "RE: RE: [nsp] ospf and bgp design question"
Previous message: Basil Dolmatov: "Re: [nsp] CEF, BGP tables and memory"
Maybe in reply to: Frank Bruce: "RE: [nsp] ospf and bgp design question"
Next in thread: Frank Bruce: "RE: RE: [nsp] ospf and bgp design question"
Reply: Frank Bruce: "RE: RE: [nsp] ospf and bgp design question"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:28 EDT