There is a bug (one of my techs confirmed it with cisco), something about
calculating a CRC...
To be fixed in 12.0.15S or some such.
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Mike Axelrod wrote:
> I was wrong, no bug here - RSP8 does write nvram slower than RSP4.
> Sorry.
> Mike
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Martin, Christian" <cmartin@gnilink.net>
> To: "'Danny Sutantyo'" <dsutanty@dsutanty-wkst.sc.intel.com>; "Martin,
> Christian" <cmartin@gnilink.net>
> Cc: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 3:30 PM
> Subject: RE: [nsp] RSP8 and SLLOOOWWW 'wr mem' performance
>
>
> >
> > Danny,
> >
> > It is an RSP8 - which only goes in a 7500... ;)
> >
> > As far as RSP4 performance, 1000 line configs save in 2-4 secs. RSP8 in
> > 20-30, 100 lines.
> >
> > I cannot find a DDTS on this. Anyone have it?
> >
> > thx,
> > chris
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Danny Sutantyo [mailto:dsutanty@dsutanty-wkst.sc.intel.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 6:27 PM
> > To: Martin, Christian
> > Cc: 'cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net'
> > Subject: Re: [nsp] RSP8 and SLLOOOWWW 'wr mem' performance
> >
> >
> > I think depends on the router you are using, routers like 7500, it's slow
> > to write mem...
> > DS
> > On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Martin, Christian wrote:
> >
> > > Folks,
> > >
> > > Has anyone seen a significant increase in NVRAM access time over RSP4
> when
> > > writing a config to it? I am seeing a 100 line config take 20-30
> seconds
> > to
> > > save, and with HSA, about 45-60 seconds total.
> > >
> > > Any ideas? I know it's a larger NVRAM - maybe this is it?
> > >
> > > Running 12.0(11)S3
> > >
> > > thx,
> > > ./chris
> > >
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:32 EDT