On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 09:32:34AM +0800, eric chan wrote:
> dear sir,
>
> rate-limit input access-group 2020 40000 32000 32000 conform-action transmit
> ex
> ceed-action drop
>
> access-list 2020 permit icmp any any echo-reply
> access-list 2020 permit icmp any any echo
>
> i am applying it on a 20M atm link.
Are you measuring packet loss with ping?
How busy is that atm link? If its approaching capacity, then your limits
are way lower than I would set them... (0.2%)
I would have expected ICMP to be at least a couple of percent.
>
>
> eric
>
> >From: Dmitri Kalintsev <dek@hades.uz>
> >To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> >Subject: Re: [nsp] CAR made packet lost ??
> >Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 01:07:27 +0200
> >
> >On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 10:05:57PM +0800, eric chan wrote:
> > > dear all,
> > >
> > > i have applied rate limit for incoming icmp on one of my
> > > interface, however, i found that there is 40% packet lost when the rate
> > > limit is active, i set the average rate to 40000, burst rate to 32000,
> > > but there is still < 10% packet lost ,
> >
> >Can we see your config, please. Sounds like your CAR access list matching
> >something wrong. ;) Please take anote that CAR is effective when there are
> >many conversations active on the link, e.g. on the high speeds. On low
> >speeds it's going to create nothing but headaches.
> >
> > >
> > > is it normal ??
> > >
> > > eric
> > >
> >_________________________________________________________________________
> > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
> >http://www.hotmail.com.
> > >
> >---end quoted text---
> >
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
--
John Payne http://www.sackheads.org/jpayne/ john@sackheads.org
http://www.sackheads.org/uce/ Fax: +44 870 0547954
To send me mail, use the address in the From: header
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:33 EDT