Re: [nsp] Routing Architecture

From: Brian (bri@sonicboom.org)
Date: Wed Apr 18 2001 - 11:07:03 EDT


Hmm private addressing at the core? let the guessing begin, I'll say @home.

                            Brian

----- Original Message -----
From: "Adam Rothschild" <asr@latency.net>
To: "Ethan" <ethan@sun.com>
Cc: "Cisco Mailing List (NSP)" <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 11:26 PM
Subject: Re: [nsp] Routing Architecture

> On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 12:50:47PM -0400, Ethan wrote:
> > In a typical service provider environment say one that provides
> > co-location services, how would one propose the routing architecture ?
> > The last one I saw divided their networks into subnets VLSM etc.. and
> > mixture of private and public addressing with *static routing* at the
> > core [...] ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Out of curiosity, which provider was this?
>
> -adam
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:35 EDT