I just shudder at the fact that people are even thinking about using
'redist connected' as an option to get routes associated with connected
interfaces into OSPF. Bug or not, I've never been in a situation where I
had to result to using this approach. In large networks (since this is
the nsp mailing list) it's an evil command and really can't think of a
sane config that requires its use where there wasn't a better way of
getting those interfaces into your igp.
I'd be quite happy if csco got rid of it...
Thanks,
Chris
>
> > Having the interface IP match the network statement qualifies an
> > interface to run ospf, this is separate issue from passing that
> > specific connected route or other routes from the routing table
> > into ospf.
>
> It sounds like you are disagreeing with what Ken said, but
> what Ken said
> is correct. When a network statement matches an interface's
> subnet, that
> subnet will get dumped into the routing table as an intra
> area route. If
> you 'redistribute connected', you shove it in as an external route.
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:38 EDT