RE: [nsp] 7206 NPE 200

From: KF (kf@reign.sk)
Date: Tue May 29 2001 - 12:02:21 EDT


Exactly, like you said, Upgrade to VXR cost lot of, and memory also...
therefore it is easyest way to upgrade just ram in NPE 200 to 256MB like
buying NPE 225 where 256MB is also !! not prooved or supported by Cisco...
Then is also an Idea to run on 3660 with 256MB ram, seems like is more
powerfull than NPE 200, the memory is not cheap also...but .. Just the
software is bit different about stability and features 'cos 7Xxx series was
the core routers time ago.... Sometimes I feel that 3660 is better solution
than 7206 VXR.... just the software and OIR ;)) the price is different. My
opinion is, that 7500 have sense ....and no 7206's... but everything is
about the price...

greetz

Alexander

-----Original Message-----
From: Gert Doering [mailto:gert@greenie.muc.de]
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 5:29 PM
To: George Robbins; gert@greenie.muc.de; jlewis@lewis.org
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; kf@reign.sk
Subject: Re: [nsp] 7206 NPE 200

Hi,

On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 11:23:12AM -0400, George Robbins wrote:
> This particular issue would be more important if NPE-225's were
> much cheaper, faster or if they were readily available on the used
> equipment market. 8-)

Actually it is important for people having non-VXR chassis, because the
NPE-225 is their only way to upgrade to more than 128 Mb RAM.

For some of us, a 7204/7026 is still ok for "full BGP", due not having
too high bandwidth requirements - we just need a way to go to 256 Mb RAM.

Upgrading to a 7206VXR/NPE-400 would be really nice, but is *quite*
costly...

gert

--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!

//www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert@greenie.muc.de fax: +49-89-35655025 gert.doering@physik.tu-muenchen.de



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:39 EDT