This feature was added via CSCdj77319. Documentation
can be found in the release notes of this bug at:
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/Bugtool/onebug.pl?bugid=CSCdj77319
Support for MSFC was added through CSCdr11394.
Relase notes are at:
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/Bugtool/onebug.pl?bugid=CSCdr11394
The problem mentioned in this e-mail that why a new
interface added comes up as "no passive-interface..." is fixed under
CSCdr09263. Release notes are at:
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/Bugtool/onebug.pl?bugid=CSCdr09263
Faraz Shamim
Cisco Systems Inc.
sshamim@cisco.com
>
> Dave Spencer <dspencer@nightfall.forlorn.net> writes:
>
> > So *my* question is, when I use "passive-interface default" and then
> > later create a new interface in the RSM for a new VLAN, why does a
> > "no passive-interface <new-vlan-interface>" show up in my OSPF
> > configuration? Cutting and pasting here from an RSM in question:
>
> This undocumented 'feature' appears not to be present on
> the MSFC (presumably someone had got round to fixing it
> by then, in much the same way as 'no ip route-cache cef'
> appearing in the configuration of newly created VLANs).
>
> M.
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:40 EDT