Re: [nsp] GEIP vs. GEIP+

From: Alex Rubenstein (alex@nac.net)
Date: Thu Jun 14 2001 - 21:47:23 EDT


In this case, ISL.

On 14 Jun 2001, (Robert E. Seastrom) wrote:

> Alex Rubenstein <alex@nac.net> writes:
>
> > It's supported by the somewhat-stable 12.0S train; we've got two GEIP+'s
> > happy on 12.0.14S and 12.0.17S
>
> With or without dot1q?
>
> ---Rob
>
>

-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, alex@nac.net, latency, Al Reuben --
-- Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:42 EDT