Re: [nsp] GEIP vs. GEIP+

From: Robert E. Seastrom (rs@seastrom.com)
Date: Thu Jun 14 2001 - 21:46:37 EDT


ok, that tends to confirm rumors from elsewhere. thanks.

Alex Rubenstein <alex@nac.net> writes:

> In this case, ISL.
>
>
> On 14 Jun 2001, (Robert E. Seastrom) wrote:
>
> > Alex Rubenstein <alex@nac.net> writes:
> >
> > > It's supported by the somewhat-stable 12.0S train; we've got two GEIP+'s
> > > happy on 12.0.14S and 12.0.17S
> >
> > With or without dot1q?
> >
> > ---Rob
> >
> >
>
> -- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, alex@nac.net, latency, Al Reuben --
> -- Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:42 EDT