At 17:04 28/07/01 -0700, Chris Whyte wrote:
> >
> > http://www.lightreading.com/testing/
> >
> > for some unbiased testing
In that case neither Juniper nor Cisco won recently :-)
http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=5479
http://www.cwnt.com/news/CoreRouterTestResults/CoreRouterTestResults.pdf
-Hank
>Having some involvement in past lives about how many of these tests are
>done I would add that you're just kidding yourself if you think one test
>is really more or less biased than the other. People read way too much
>into these tests and, for some very odd reason, always seem to think
>there's some big conspiracy behind how the tests are conducted or who
>created the testplan. Each vendor will try to influence a test plan to
>point out perceived or potentially real weaknesses in their competitors
>products. It's called "technical marketing". Like it or not it has
>proven value to the vendor.
>
>But I think it's safe to say that we all learn much more about a given
>product by talking with each other about our successful or painful
>deployments and why we chose a specific vendor. At the end of the day I
>think most of us can weed out the "religious bigots" and figure out what
>box is probably best for our own network. In some cases that will be
>cisco and in some case that will certainly be juniper.
>
>My only suggestion is to try to spend more time focusing on the latter
>rather than the former.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Chris
>
> >
> > -andy
> >
> > jakasemboeng wrote on 28 July 2001 at 17:36:
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Patriawan Carlos [mailto:cpatriaw@yahoo.com]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 12:10 PM
> > > > Subject: Cisco GSR 12416 vs Juniper M160
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Cisco kick out Juniper again
> > > >
> > > > http://www.mier.com/reports/cisco/Cisco12400JuniperM160.pdf
> > > >
> > > > http://www.mier.com
> > > >
> > > >Any comment about this....let's share with us
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:47 EDT