Re: [nsp] CatOS 6.2.2 and cat 6509/sup2/msfc2

From: Rubens Kuhl Jr. (rkuhljr@uol.com.br)
Date: Thu Aug 09 2001 - 07:33:45 EDT


6.2(2) has made its will of not running with two sup2/msfc2 very clear when
it simply wasn't routing during tests... running two boxes with single
sup(1/2)/msfc(1/2) has a much better history of providing network resilency
and overall happiness.

If you are going to try out other software versions, look at 6.2(3) and
6.1(4) ; 6.2(2) has an adjacency learning bug that we haven't reproduced on
6.1(4) and Cisco claims to be solved on 6.2(3) (will do some testing on
this next week).

Rubens Kuhl Jr.

>Hi people,
>Has anyone encountered any problems with the above equipment, I ask because
>we are experiencing MAJOR network outages if we make the configuration
>resilient - even adding a second sup2/msfc2 breaks it!!!!
>
>Brian Murphy
>SAG-WAN



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:48 EDT