Re: [nsp] 2500 and ssh

From: Gert Doering (gert@greenie.muc.de)
Date: Mon Aug 13 2001 - 09:10:17 EDT

Next message: Todd, Douglas M.: "RE: [nsp] 2500 and ssh"
Previous message: Shankar Vemulapalli: "Re: [nsp] BGP next-hop and IS-IS areas... [Was: A question regarding BGP next-hop reachability.]"
In reply to: Robert E. Seastrom: "Re: [nsp] 2500 and ssh"
Next in thread: Charles Sprickman: "Re: [nsp] 2500 and ssh"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Hi,

On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 08:43:15PM -0400, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
> -r--r--r-- 2 ftpadmin ftpint 7142036 Aug 2 01:18 c2500-k4p-l.120-16.S3
> -r--r--r-- 2 ftpadmin ftpint 7173276 Jul 11 15:19 c2500-k4p-l.120-17.S1
> -r--r--r-- 2 ftpadmin ftpint 7265180 Aug 2 01:59 c2500-k4p-l.120-18.5.S
> -r--r--r-- 2 ftpadmin ftpint 7224000 Aug 2 01:49 c2500-k4p-l.120-18.S

That's ftp-eng, isn't it? 12.0S is not offical for anything but
7200/7500/12000... :-(

gert

-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert.doering@physik.tu-muenchen.de

Next message: Todd, Douglas M.: "RE: [nsp] 2500 and ssh"
Previous message: Shankar Vemulapalli: "Re: [nsp] BGP next-hop and IS-IS areas... [Was: A question regarding BGP next-hop reachability.]"
In reply to: Robert E. Seastrom: "Re: [nsp] 2500 and ssh"
Next in thread: Charles Sprickman: "Re: [nsp] 2500 and ssh"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:49 EDT