> Here's the problem: on the same router, we've got 2 ebgp peers, a bunch
> of private peers, 2 ibgp peers, and a few customer T1's. In an effort
> to be good netizens, we're nailing our aggregated BGP announcements to
> lo0 with high-metric static routes. CEF apparently sees fit to load
> balance between the best BGP peer and the loopback. The router accepts
> 'no ip load-share per-pack' on lo0, but returns 'Invalid input' upon
> entering 'no ip load-share per-dest'.
>
> Is this a problem with 20CC, with using CAR on a border, or am I (once
> again :) overlooking the obvious?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Brian
If you put a high weight after the route statement, it shouldn't find
it as a candidate route.
i.e. do:
ip route 207.8.128.0 255.255.128.0 lo0 250
instead of
ip route 207.8.128.0 255.255.128.0 lo0
Avi
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:13:13 EDT