Re: [nsp] Re: TTL issues [NO - NOTHING TO DO WIH DOS ATTACKS]

From: Kai (kai@conti.nu)
Date: Mon Mar 30 1998 - 02:28:16 EST


At 09:48 AM 3/29/98 -0500, you wrote:
>Why not use static MAC mappings and turn off arp?
>
>Avi
>

Is this possible
a.) with a Cisco Catalyst switch 1900 ? (And how many fixed MAC addresses
    per switched port does it allow?)
b.) with an arbitrary access router (25xx,45xx,47xx) on an arbitrary
    ethernet port ?

I am asking this more in relation to wiring a building with ethernet, where
NO single attachment can be trusted, and traffic has to be restricted
to a defined list of devices (MAC addresses).

bye,Kai

--
kai@pac-rim.net           "Just say No" to Spam           Kai Schlichting
Palo Alto, CA                                  Pacific Rim Communications
Kai's SpamShield <tm> is FREE!  http://www.abest.com/~kai/spamshield.html
|                                                                       |
LeasedLines-FrameRelay-IPLs-ISDN-PPP-Cisco-Consulting-VoiceFax-Data-Muxes
WorldWideWebAnything-Intranets-NetAdmin-UnixAdmin-Security-ReallyHardMath



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:13:16 EDT