>Monday, April 8, 2002, 3:41:07 PM, Dmitri Krioukov wrote:
>[...]
>> 2) I guess Curtis was arguing against word "path" here. "Path"
>> sounds too "end-2-end-ish" (even taking into consideration that
>> it can look very different at different nodes along the data
>> path) and, hence, it's quite a stretch, I think, to say that
>> DV nodes, for example, do "*path* setup."
>
>Agree, that's why I like calling it 'forwarding state setup'.
>
>Alex
There's also still room for ambiguity with respect to sub-IP interaction.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 04 2003 - 04:10:04 EDT