"Phil Neumiller" <pneumiller@meshnetworks.com> shaped photons and/or
electrons to say:
> > Alex,
>>
>> > Following this line, is it possible to imagine an architecture where
>> > addresses are topologically significant and prefixes are also
>> > topologically significant? And then having a mechanism for
>> > name-to-prefix mapping?
>> >
>> > I might be far off from what "topologically significant" means
>> > exactly.
>>
>> I smell a MONET discussion here ;)
>
>That's funny I distinctly detected the odor of MANET as well!
No, no. You have an Impression of both.
Seriously, this discussion really tends to argue against the
statement in the draft that IP mobility solves host mobility.
Howard
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 04 2003 - 04:10:04 EDT