At 10:34 PM +0800 4/25/02, Jing Shen wrote:
>??
>Hi,
>
>as it is said that new routing arch. and protocol may be required.
>
>By now it seem interdomain TE is not investigated carefully , but as
>I think it may be required
>by ISP or IDC providers to use different service not only to cost
>consideration but also to
>QoS requirement. Such problem is also of intradomain routing with
>TE&QoS requirement.
>
>What I think about whether multipath routing should be considered
>in next generation
>arch. or protocol. Unipath is good in overprovisioned situation but
>what about the
>full utilization of resource and absort bursty traffic which we do
>not expect in the fist hand.
>
>would you please give some hints with this ?
>
>thanks
>
>jing shen
It is my impression that both requirements drafts mention both
multipath and multihoming, admittedly without precise definition.
Suggestions on more detail would certainly be welcome.
Howard
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 04 2003 - 04:10:04 EDT