From lists@visionsix.com Tue Mar 18 18:58:19 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be mordrede.visionsix.com puck.NOSPAM (mordrede.visionsix.com [65.202.119.3]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.8/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h2INwIbw018004 for ; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 18:58:19 -0500 Received: from vsis169 (unverified [65.202.119.169]) by mordrede.visionsix.com for ; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 17:59:02 -0600 Message-ID: <007a01c2edaa$52e0e990$a977ca41@vsis169> From: "Lewis Watson" To: "cisco-nas" Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 17:58:50 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 19:09:20 -0500 Subject: [cisco-nas] AS5350 & V.92 X-BeenThere: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: list for cisco NAS users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 23:58:20 -0000 I am wondering what is the recommended IOS and .spe for using the AS5350 with V.92 at this time. Thank you. Lewis From Aaron@Leonard.Tucson.AZ.US Wed Mar 19 00:46:28 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be fire.cisco.com puck.NOSPAM (firebird.cisco.com [171.68.227.73]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.8/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h2J5kRbv017595 for ; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 00:46:27 -0500 Received: from AARONW2K2 (sjc-vpn2-922.cisco.com [10.21.115.154]) by fire.cisco.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.8.8) with SMTP id h2J5l1r14670; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 21:47:01 -0800 (PST) From: "Aaron Leonard" To: "Lewis Watson" Subject: RE: [cisco-nas] AS5350 & V.92 Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 21:47:00 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-reply-to: <007a01c2edaa$52e0e990$a977ca41@vsis169> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 cc: cisco-nas X-BeenThere: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: list for cisco NAS users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 05:46:28 -0000 Right now, 12.2(2)XB10 with the bundled 7.17 SPE code would be recommended for the AS5350. Aaron -----Original Message----- From: cisco-nas-bounces@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nas-bounces@puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Lewis Watson Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 3:59 PM To: cisco-nas Subject: [cisco-nas] AS5350 & V.92 I am wondering what is the recommended IOS and .spe for using the AS5350 with V.92 at this time. Thank you. Lewis _______________________________________________ cisco-nas mailing list cisco-nas@puck.nether.net http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nas From lists@visionsix.com Wed Mar 19 01:12:29 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be mordrede.visionsix.com puck.NOSPAM (mordrede.visionsix.com [65.202.119.3]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.8/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h2J6CRbw019482 for ; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 01:12:28 -0500 Received: from vsis169 (unverified [65.202.119.169]) by mordrede.visionsix.com (Vircom SMTPRS 2.0.239) with SMTP id ; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 00:13:09 -0600 Message-ID: <001b01c2edde$9617a5d0$a977ca41@vsis169> From: "Lewis Watson" To: "Aaron Leonard" References: Subject: Re: [cisco-nas] AS5350 & V.92 Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 00:12:57 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 17:54:31 -0500 cc: cisco-nas X-BeenThere: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: list for cisco NAS users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 06:12:29 -0000 Thanks..... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Aaron Leonard" To: "Lewis Watson" Cc: "cisco-nas" Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 11:47 PM Subject: RE: [cisco-nas] AS5350 & V.92 > Right now, 12.2(2)XB10 with the bundled 7.17 SPE code > would be recommended for the AS5350. > > Aaron > > -----Original Message----- > From: cisco-nas-bounces@puck.nether.net > [mailto:cisco-nas-bounces@puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Lewis Watson > Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 3:59 PM > To: cisco-nas > Subject: [cisco-nas] AS5350 & V.92 > > > I am wondering what is the recommended IOS and .spe for using the AS5350 > with V.92 at this time. > Thank you. > Lewis > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nas mailing list > cisco-nas@puck.nether.net > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nas > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nas mailing list > cisco-nas@puck.nether.net > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nas > From jlewis@lewis.org Fri Mar 21 14:07:26 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be redhat1.mmaero.com puck.NOSPAM (IDENT:root@redhat1.mmaero.com [208.152.224.2]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.8/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h2LJ7PU5015593 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 14:07:26 -0500 Received: from localhost (jlewis@localhost) by redhat1.mmaero.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id h2LJ8IH15232 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 14:08:18 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: redhat1.mmaero.com: jlewis owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 14:08:17 -0500 (EST) From: jlewis@lewis.org X-X-Sender: jlewis@redhat1.mmaero.com To: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: [cisco-nas] ppp over frame IOS bug? X-BeenThere: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: list for cisco NAS users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 19:07:26 -0000 I'm testing PPP over Frame in "the lab" on my desk and have run into something odd. My setup is a 7206vxr, PA-MC-T3, M13 MUX, 1602, wic-1T, and an Adtran TSU LT. Relevant parts of the configs follow: [7206] frame-relay switching ! controller T3 2/0 cablelength 10 t1 1 channel-group 0 timeslots 1-24 ! interface Serial2/0/1:0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay IETF frame-relay lmi-type ansi frame-relay intf-type dce ! interface Serial2/0/1:0.1 point-to-point frame-relay interface-dlci 16 ppp Virtual-Template1 ! interface Virtual-Template1 bandwidth 64 ip unnumbered Loopback0 load-interval 30 max-reserved-bandwidth 99 fair-queue ppp multilink ppp multilink fragment-delay 10 ppp multilink interleave [1602] interface Virtual-Template1 bandwidth 384 ip unnumbered Loopback0 max-reserved-bandwidth 99 no ip route-cache load-interval 30 fair-queue 64 16 0 ppp multilink ppp multilink fragment-delay 10 ppp multilink interleave ! interface Serial1 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay IETF no ip route-cache frame-relay lmi-type ansi ! interface Serial1.1 point-to-point no ip route-cache frame-relay interface-dlci 16 ppp Virtual-Template1 The 1600 is running c1600-y-l.122-16.bin. The 7206 was originally running c7200-is-mz.121-16.bin. I got the above setup working and then decided I should try it with the IOS we're running on the production router that needs to support this sort of setup. So I upgraded the 7206 to c7200-js-mz.121-5.T12.bin. This broke the PPP session. Debug ppp neg on the 7206 produced the following, which would repeat indefinitely. 00:55:40: Vi1 LCP: O CONFREQ [ACKsent] id 216 len 21 00:55:40: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0xD039C9EB (0x0506D039C9EB) 00:55:40: Vi1 LCP: MRRU 1524 (0x110405F4) 00:55:40: Vi1 LCP: EndpointDisc 1 Local (0x13070137323030) 00:55:41: Vi1 LCP: I CONFREQ [ACKsent] id 213 len 23 00:55:41: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0xE02F554D (0x0506E02F554D) 00:55:41: Vi1 LCP: MRRU 1524 (0x110405F4) 00:55:41: Vi1 LCP: EndpointDisc 1 Local (0x130901526F75746572) 00:55:41: Vi1 LCP: O CONFACK [ACKsent] id 213 len 23 00:55:41: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0xE02F554D (0x0506E02F554D) 00:55:41: Vi1 LCP: MRRU 1524 (0x110405F4) 00:55:41: Vi1 LCP: EndpointDisc 1 Local (0x130901526F75746572) 00:55:42: Vi1 LCP: TIMEout: State ACKsent On the 1602 side, I got the following, repeating as above. 00:38:05: Vi1 LCP: O CONFREQ [REQsent] id 196 len 23 00:38:05: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0xE041AC65 (0x0506E041AC65) 00:38:05: Vi1 LCP: MRRU 1524 (0x110405F4) 00:38:05: Vi1 LCP: EndpointDisc 1 Router (0x130901526F75746572) 00:38:07: Vi1 LCP: TIMEout: State REQsent I then upgraded the 7206 to c7200-p-mz.122-14.S.bin, and with no config changes on either end, the PPP session works again. According to FN, this is supported in c7200-js-mz.121-5.T12.bin. Anyone know if it's known to be broken in c7200-js-mz.121-5.T12.bin? It looks like I'm going to be forced to upgrade production routers from c7200-js-mz.121-5.T12.bin to something newer...perhaps 122-14.S, which appears to be working on our 7513. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Lewis *jlewis@lewis.org*| I route System Administrator | therefore you are Atlantic Net | _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________ From peder@voralt.net Sat Mar 29 16:04:40 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be mail.angvall.net puck.NOSPAM ([65.205.112.87]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.8/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h2TL4diE004740 for ; Sat, 29 Mar 2003 16:04:39 -0500 Received: from threebert (unknown [65.205.112.83]) by mail.angvall.net (Postfix) with SMTP id D70EA4390 for ; Sat, 29 Mar 2003 15:06:16 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <19e001c2f636$fd3c2780$5370cd41@threebert> From: "Voralt" To: Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 15:05:55 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300 Subject: [cisco-nas] ISDN PRI Users X-BeenThere: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: list for cisco NAS users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 21:04:40 -0000 I have a PRI with several 128k ISDN customers. Is there a way to create a separate "interface" for each user? I want to be able to check utilization on a per user basis, use ACL's, etc, but as it is when they drop and reconnect, they are on a different Virtual interface. Also, I don't want to have to use RADIUS. I am looking for something like this: int X desc user1 access-group user1asl in int Y desc user2 access-group user2asl in etc. Any ideas? From zahmed@cisco.com Sat Mar 29 16:51:15 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be syd-msg-core-1.cisco.com puck.NOSPAM (syd-msg-core-1.cisco.com [64.104.193.198]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.8/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h2TLpDiE007728 for ; Sat, 29 Mar 2003 16:51:15 -0500 Received: from sj-cse-510.cisco.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) h2TLqSPw014554; Sun, 30 Mar 2003 07:52:30 +1000 (EST) Received: from localhost (zahmed@localhost)h2TLqVS28542; Sat, 29 Mar 2003 13:52:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 13:52:31 -0800 (PST) From: Zulfiqar Ahmed To: Voralt Subject: Re: [cisco-nas] ISDN PRI Users In-Reply-To: <19e001c2f636$fd3c2780$5370cd41@threebert> Message-ID: References: <19e001c2f636$fd3c2780$5370cd41@threebert> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-BeenThere: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: list for cisco NAS users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 21:51:16 -0000 Voralt, You could use dialer profiles : http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/tech/tk801/tk133/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094e6c.shtml ~Zulfi On Sat, 29 Mar 2003, Voralt wrote: > I have a PRI with several 128k ISDN customers. Is there a way to create a > separate "interface" for each user? I want to be able to check utilization > on a per user basis, use ACL's, etc, but as it is when they drop and > reconnect, they are on a different Virtual interface. Also, I don't want to > have > to use RADIUS. I am looking for something like this: > > int X > desc user1 > access-group user1asl in > > int Y > desc user2 > access-group user2asl in > > etc. > > Any ideas? > > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nas mailing list > cisco-nas@puck.nether.net > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nas > From Michel.Lanners@Cetrel.LU Mon Mar 31 07:45:31 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be merlin.cetrel.lu puck.NOSPAM (Floyd.cetrel.lu [193.168.2.131]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h2VCjTEa020148 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 07:45:30 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by merlin.cetrel.lu id OAA02654 for cisco-nas@puck.nether.net; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 14:46:56 +0200 (METDST) Sender: Michel.Lanners@Cetrel.LU Message-ID: <3E8838BA.29C42A4@cetrel.lu> Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 14:46:50 +0200 From: Michel Lanners Organization: Cetrel S.C. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; HP-UX B.11.00 9000/800) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [cisco-nas] Call statistics options? X-BeenThere: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: list for cisco NAS users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 12:45:31 -0000 This electronic message is not binding on its sender nor on Cetrel S.C. Any use of information of this mail except the use by the addressee within his or her business relation with Cetrel is strictly forbidden CETREL S.C. L-2956 Luxembourg; Tel: 00352 35566-1; http://www.cetrel.lu ======================================================================= Hi all, What are the options to get call statistics out of an AS5400? We're interested in some call parameters like call duration, called number, maybe bytes in/out. So far I've seen these options: - syslog: modem call records. I don't like this, because it fills my syslog files, and I need to extract the calls with some scripts from the other syslog messages (syslog-ng is not an option). - calltracker SNMP traps: I've not been able to get these working (IOS is c5400-is-mz.122-2.XB10). Is this a known bug? Otherwise, once it works, this seems to be a viable option. - Tacacs/Radius: we have a tacacs server, but I am not sure it will handle the load very well. We're looking at some 60000 calls a day. Although, it stays below 10 calls/sec.... The good part is it's the open-source Tacacs+ daemon so I could modify the source to log the format & details I want only. Anything I am overlooking? Any comments about the above? Cheers, and thanks Michel -- Michel Lanners | "Being able to break security PRO-SSC | doesn't make you a hacker michel.lanners@cetrel.lu | more than being able to hotwire cars Cetrel S.C. | makes you an automotive engineer." 10, Parc d'Activite Syrdall | L-5365 Munsbach | Eric S. Raymond From oyundalai@mail.mobicom.mn Tue Mar 25 20:19:38 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be mobinet.mn puck.NOSPAM ([202.131.224.19]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.8/8.12.6) with SMTP id h2Q1JYiE005366 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2003 20:19:35 -0500 Received: (qmail 3695 invoked by uid 85); 26 Mar 2003 01:22:52 -0000 Received: from oyundalai@mail.mobicom.mn by mail.mobinet.mn by uid 82 with qmail-scanner-1.11 (uvscan: v4.1.60/v4200. . Clear:. Processed in 0.462524 secs); 26 Mar 2003 01:22:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dalai) (202.131.225.130) by mail.mobinet.mn with SMTP; 26 Mar 2003 01:22:52 -0000 Message-ID: <004e01c2f336$428289f0$2500a8c0@dalai> From: "Oyundalai.N" To: Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 09:23:08 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 13:29:28 -0400 Subject: [cisco-nas] Modem negotiation time X-BeenThere: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: list for cisco NAS users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 01:19:38 -0000 hello all. We use 5300 to accept calls from GSM mobile WAP terminals. Connection speed is 9600bit/s. Negotiation duration is about 40 second. How to decrease this time. I would like 5-10 second if possible. dalai. From dpeng@cisco.com Mon Apr 7 11:33:09 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be syd-msg-core-1.cisco.com puck.NOSPAM (syd-msg-core-1.cisco.com [64.104.193.198]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h37FX7W0021822 for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 11:33:09 -0400 Received: from sj-cse-320.cisco.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) h37FWrcn029679; Tue, 8 Apr 2003 01:32:54 +1000 (EST) Received: (from dpeng@localhost) by sj-cse-320.cisco.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) id h37FWsx22896; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 08:32:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 08:32:54 -0700 From: Dennis Peng To: "Oyundalai.N" Subject: Re: [cisco-nas] Modem negotiation time Message-ID: <20030407153254.GD22566@sj-cse-320.cisco.com> References: <004e01c2f336$428289f0$2500a8c0@dalai> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <004e01c2f336$428289f0$2500a8c0@dalai> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-BeenThere: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: list for cisco NAS users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 15:33:10 -0000 Please turn on millisecond timestamps and then get the output of "Debug isdn q931", "debug csm modem", "debug modem", "debug ppp negot" and "debug radius". This will tell us where the slowness is being introduced and allow us to try things to tune it. Dennis Oyundalai.N [oyundalai@mail.mobicom.mn] wrote: > hello all. > > We use 5300 to accept calls from GSM mobile WAP terminals. Connection speed > is 9600bit/s. Negotiation duration is about 40 second. How to decrease this > time. I would like 5-10 second if possible. > > dalai. > > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nas mailing list > cisco-nas@puck.nether.net > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nas -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- || || Dennis Peng || || Cisco Systems, Inc. Escalation Engineer |||| |||| 170 West Tasman Drive Phone: (408) 526-6143 ..:||||||:..:||||||:.. San Jose, CA 95134 Fax: (408) 232-2343 Cisco Systems Inc. dpeng@cisco.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- From AARON@Cisco.COM Mon Apr 7 12:11:47 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be sj-core-1.cisco.com puck.NOSPAM (sj-core-1.cisco.com [171.71.177.237]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h37GBkW0024936 for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 12:11:46 -0400 Received: from Magno.Cisco.COM (magno.cisco.com [171.71.78.61]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h37GBimr009255 for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 09:11:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Cisco.COM by Cisco.COM (PMDF V5.1-7 #12361) id <01KUFUPBAEF49I4RCD@Cisco.COM> for cisco-nas@puck.nether.net; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 09:11:43 PDT Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 08:50:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Aaron Leonard Subject: Re: [cisco-nas] Modem negotiation time In-reply-to: "Your message dated Mon, 07 Apr 2003 08:32:54 -0700" <20030407153254.GD22566@sj-cse-320.cisco.com> Sender: Aaron Leonard To: Dennis Peng Message-id: <01KUFVIS46609I4RCD@Cisco.COM> Organization: Cisco Customer Advocacy Escalation MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii References: <004e01c2f336$428289f0$2500a8c0@dalai> <004e01c2f336$428289f0$2500a8c0@dalai> cc: "Oyundalai.N" cc: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-BeenThere: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Aaron Leonard List-Id: list for cisco NAS users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 16:11:47 -0000 Normally (ideally), GSM traffic will be transported thru the PSTN as V.110. If you can do things this way, the calls will come up within a couple of seconds. If you need to carry the GSM traffic as an analog modulation, (which you would need to do, for example, if your 5300 is connected to the PSTN via R2 rather than ISDN), then you'll probably want to use V.32/V.32bis. To minimize training time in V.32/V.32bis, use this modemcap (assumes 2.9.4.0 portware): &F&D2S0=0S29=3S53=0S54=32968 S0=0 Do not delay answerback tone (CSCdw05174) S29=3 Top modulation V.32bis S53=0 No V.8bis S54=32968 Default value + 32768 (save 400ms - CSCdw05174) If the calls aren't using error control, then disable it. (S15=0S23=0S24=0). Include "show modem operational-status /" on a call so that we can see what exactly the GSM call is using. Aaron --- > Please turn on millisecond timestamps and then get the output of > "Debug isdn q931", "debug csm modem", "debug modem", "debug ppp negot" > and "debug radius". This will tell us where the slowness is being > introduced and allow us to try things to tune it. > Dennis > Oyundalai.N [oyundalai@mail.mobicom.mn] wrote: > > hello all. > > > > We use 5300 to accept calls from GSM mobile WAP terminals. Connection speed > > is 9600bit/s. Negotiation duration is about 40 second. How to decrease this > > time. I would like 5-10 second if possible. > > > > dalai. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > cisco-nas mailing list > > cisco-nas@puck.nether.net > > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nas > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > || || Dennis Peng > || || Cisco Systems, Inc. Escalation Engineer > |||| |||| 170 West Tasman Drive Phone: (408) 526-6143 > ..:||||||:..:||||||:.. San Jose, CA 95134 Fax: (408) 232-2343 > Cisco Systems Inc. dpeng@cisco.com > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nas mailing list > cisco-nas@puck.nether.net > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nas From achatz@forthnet.gr Mon Apr 21 10:00:26 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be athsmtp99.forthnet.gr puck.NOSPAM (mail.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.160]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h3LE0PcL008262 for ; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 10:00:26 -0400 Received: from forthnet.gr ([194.219.203.122]) by athsmtp99.forthnet.gr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.4386); Mon, 21 Apr 2003 16:57:12 +0300 Message-ID: <3EA3F992.3070607@forthnet.gr> Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 17:00:50 +0300 From: Tassos Chatzithomaoglou Organization: FORTHnet SA User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02 X-Accept-Language: el, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-7; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Apr 2003 13:57:12.0348 (UTC) FILETIME=[E86BC5C0:01C3080D] Subject: [cisco-nas] different radius for auth/acct X-BeenThere: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: list for cisco NAS users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 14:00:27 -0000 I have the following radius config: !--------------------------------------------------------------------------- aaa group server radius RADIUS-SERVERS server 194.219.x.x auth-port 1812 acct-port 1813 server 194.219.y.y auth-port 1812 acct-port 1813 deadtime 15 ! radius-server host 194.219.x.x auth-port 1812 acct-port 1813 non-standard radius-server host 194.219.y.y auth-port 1812 acct-port 1813 non-standard !--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Is there a way, i can have 194.219.x.x for auth only and 194.219.y.y for acct only? -- *********************************** Chatzithomaoglou Anastasios Network Design & Operations Center FORTHnet S.A. *********************************** From james@tyrall.net Mon Apr 21 10:10:51 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be mail.starnetusa.net puck.NOSPAM (mail.starnetusa.net [216.126.128.20]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h3LEApcL009085 for ; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 10:10:51 -0400 Received: from [216.126.129.43] (noc10.starnetusa.net [216.126.129.43]) by mail.starnetusa.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D14D164; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 09:11:30 -0500 (CDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: james@mail.tyrall.net Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <3EA3F992.3070607@forthnet.gr> References: <3EA3F992.3070607@forthnet.gr> Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 09:11:29 -0500 To: Tassos Chatzithomaoglou , cisco-nas@puck.nether.net From: James Parr Subject: Re: [cisco-nas] different radius for auth/acct Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-BeenThere: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: list for cisco NAS users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 14:10:51 -0000 Yes just set the port you don't want to use on .x.x and .y.y to 0 rather then a valid port number. Here is an example because it is early and I can't think of how to expalin it :) radius-server host 194.219.x.x auth-port 1812 acct-port 0 non-standard radius-server host 194.219.y.y auth-port 0 acct-port 1813 non-standard At 5:00 PM +0300 4/21/03, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote: >I have the following radius config: > >!--------------------------------------------------------------------------- >aaa group server radius RADIUS-SERVERS > server 194.219.x.x auth-port 1812 acct-port 1813 > server 194.219.y.y auth-port 1812 acct-port 1813 > deadtime 15 >! >radius-server host 194.219.x.x auth-port 1812 acct-port 1813 non-standard >radius-server host 194.219.y.y auth-port 1812 acct-port 1813 non-standard >!--------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Is there a way, i can have 194.219.x.x for auth only and 194.219.y.y >for acct only? > >-- >*********************************** > Chatzithomaoglou Anastasios >Network Design & Operations Center > FORTHnet S.A. > >*********************************** > >_______________________________________________ >cisco-nas mailing list >cisco-nas@puck.nether.net >http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nas -- James Tomorrow will be cancelled due to lack of interest. - Anonymous "Trying is the first step towards failure." - Homer Simpson From achatz@forthnet.gr Wed Apr 23 09:06:14 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be athsmtp01.forthnet.gr puck.NOSPAM (mail.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.160]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h3ND6CM3027111 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 09:06:13 -0400 Received: from forthnet.gr ([194.219.203.122]) by athsmtp01.forthnet.gr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Wed, 23 Apr 2003 16:06:55 +0300 Message-ID: <3EA6909F.3070406@forthnet.gr> Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 16:09:51 +0300 From: Tassos Chatzithomaoglou Organization: FORTHnet SA User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02 X-Accept-Language: el, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-7; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Apr 2003 13:06:55.0470 (UTC) FILETIME=[370C38E0:01C30999] Subject: [cisco-nas] "annoying" output while "wr mem" X-BeenThere: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: list for cisco NAS users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 13:06:14 -0000 IOS (tm) 5300 Software (C5300-IS-M), Version 12.2(13)T3, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) dial-ath-25#wr mem Building configuration... This command has no effect on this line; use modem AT commands instead <--------- [OK] Is this supposed to be a bug? -- *********************************** Chatzithomaoglou Anastasios Network Design & Operations Center FORTHnet S.A. *********************************** From james@tyrall.net Wed Apr 23 09:24:30 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be mail.starnetusa.net puck.NOSPAM (mail.starnetusa.net [216.126.128.20]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h3NDOUM3029045 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 09:24:30 -0400 Received: from [216.126.129.43] (noc10.starnetusa.net [216.126.129.43]) by mail.starnetusa.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7853016C; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 08:25:16 -0500 (CDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: james@mail.tyrall.net Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <3EA6909F.3070406@forthnet.gr> References: <3EA6909F.3070406@forthnet.gr> Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 08:25:14 -0500 To: Tassos Chatzithomaoglou , cisco-nas@puck.nether.net From: James Parr Subject: Re: [cisco-nas] "annoying" output while "wr mem" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-BeenThere: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: list for cisco NAS users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 13:24:31 -0000 You are using a T release and that is not really recommended unless you have to, but I don't think this issue is related to that. I am not experienced with this error message at all, but I would recommend you verify you do not have any messed up commands in your config. Specifically I would say look at your modemcap and the line configs. Sorry if this is not very specific, I hope this was enough help to get you in the right direction. -- James At 4:09 PM +0300 4/23/03, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote: >IOS (tm) 5300 Software (C5300-IS-M), Version 12.2(13)T3, RELEASE >SOFTWARE (fc2) > >dial-ath-25#wr mem >Building configuration... >This command has no effect on this line; use modem AT commands >instead <--------- >[OK] > > >Is this supposed to be a bug? > >-- >*********************************** > Chatzithomaoglou Anastasios >Network Design & Operations Center > FORTHnet S.A. > >*********************************** > >_______________________________________________ >cisco-nas mailing list >cisco-nas@puck.nether.net >http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nas -- James Tomorrow will be cancelled due to lack of interest. - Anonymous "Trying is the first step towards failure." - Homer Simpson From astrand@unicc.org Wed Apr 23 09:30:02 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be aludra.unicc.org puck.NOSPAM (smtpextout.unicc.org [193.194.138.76]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h3NDU0M3029509 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 09:30:01 -0400 Received: from adara.unicc.org (smtpscanout [192.168.202.41]) h3NDUl823390 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 15:30:47 +0200 Received: from mekoe.unicc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])h3NDUkT29187 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 15:30:46 +0200 Received: from hermes.unicc.org ([192.168.46.100])h3NDUko28971 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 15:30:46 +0200 To: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.07a May 14, 2001 Message-ID: From: "Harald Astrand" Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 15:20:17 +0200 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on Hermes/Mail/SRV/ICC(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 04/23/2003 03:20:17 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: [cisco-nas] Callback with Microsoft IAS (RADIUS) X-BeenThere: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: list for cisco NAS users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 13:30:02 -0000 Hi, I am trying to get callback working on an AS5200 (12.0.7(T)) using RADIUS. The AAA server used is a Windows 2000 Server running IAS. On the AS5200 I have the following AAA configuration: aaa new-model aaa group server radius RASGROUP server 10.168.10.13 auth-port 1645 acct-port 1646 server 10.168.10.14 auth-port 1645 acct-port 1646 ! aaa authentication login RAS group RASGROUP aaa authentication ppp RAS group RASGROUP aaa authorization exec RAS group RASGROUP aaa authorization network RAS group RASGROUP aaa accounting exec RAS start-stop group RASGROUP aaa accounting network RAS start-stop group RASGROUP interface Group-Async 1 ppp authentication pap RAS ppp authorization RAS ppp accounting RAS I have set us the policy in IAS to return the following parameters: Framed-Protocol=PPP Service-Type=Framed (there does not seem to be any service-type called Framed-User) Cisco-AV-Pair="lcp:callback-dialstring=12345678" Unfortunately, I am not able to get this to work. Are there any more parameters that I have to return to the NAS? Also, if possible I would like to specify the callback number in the user profile (and not in a AV-pair) Any help would be greatly appreciated! Regards, Harald From AARON@Cisco.COM Wed Apr 23 11:18:43 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be sj-core-5.cisco.com puck.NOSPAM (sj-core-5.cisco.com [171.71.177.238]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h3NFIhM3004290 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 11:18:43 -0400 Received: from Magno.Cisco.COM (magno.cisco.com [171.71.78.61]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h3NFJNEL017722 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 08:19:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Cisco.COM by Cisco.COM (PMDF V5.1-7 #12361) id <01KV25QRLDSW9I5OQ4@Cisco.COM> for cisco-nas@puck.nether.net; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 08:19:16 PDT Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 08:18:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Aaron Leonard Subject: Re: [cisco-nas] "annoying" output while "wr mem" In-reply-to: "Your message dated Wed, 23 Apr 2003 08:25:14 -0500" Sender: Aaron Leonard To: James Parr Message-id: <01KV26D9KKAC9I5OQ4@Cisco.COM> Organization: Cisco Customer Advocacy Escalation MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" References: <3EA6909F.3070406@forthnet.gr> <3EA6909F.3070406@forthnet.gr> cc: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-BeenThere: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Aaron Leonard List-Id: list for cisco NAS users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 15:18:44 -0000 This is CSCdz17325, fixed in 12.2(13.4)T (hence in 12.2(15)T.) This is purely cosmetic, and I would not consider it to be a good reason to change IOS. Aaron --- > You are using a T release and that is not really recommended unless > you have to, but I don't think this issue is related to that. I am > not experienced with this error message at all, but I would recommend > you verify you do not have any messed up commands in your config. > Specifically I would say look at your modemcap and the line configs. > Sorry if this is not very specific, I hope this was enough help to > get you in the right direction. > -- James > At 4:09 PM +0300 4/23/03, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote: > >IOS (tm) 5300 Software (C5300-IS-M), Version 12.2(13)T3, RELEASE > >SOFTWARE (fc2) > > > >dial-ath-25#wr mem > >Building configuration... > >This command has no effect on this line; use modem AT commands > >instead <--------- > >[OK] > > > > > >Is this supposed to be a bug? > > > >-- > >*********************************** > > Chatzithomaoglou Anastasios > >Network Design & Operations Center > > FORTHnet S.A. > > > >*********************************** > > > >_______________________________________________ > >cisco-nas mailing list > >cisco-nas@puck.nether.net > >http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nas > -- > James > Tomorrow will be cancelled due to lack of interest. - Anonymous > "Trying is the first step towards failure." - Homer Simpson > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nas mailing list > cisco-nas@puck.nether.net > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nas From dpeng@cisco.com Wed Apr 23 11:19:29 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be sj-core-1.cisco.com puck.NOSPAM (sj-core-1.cisco.com [171.71.177.237]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h3NFJTM3004305 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 11:19:29 -0400 Received: from sj-cse-320.cisco.com (sj-cse-320.cisco.com [171.69.88.101]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h3NFKC08027347; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 08:20:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from dpeng@localhost) by sj-cse-320.cisco.com (8.11.7+Sun/8.11.6) id h3NFKCC12365; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 08:20:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 08:20:12 -0700 From: Dennis Peng To: Tassos Chatzithomaoglou Subject: Re: [cisco-nas] "annoying" output while "wr mem" Message-ID: <20030423152012.GC12299@sj-cse-320.cisco.com> References: <3EA6909F.3070406@forthnet.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3EA6909F.3070406@forthnet.gr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-BeenThere: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: list for cisco NAS users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 15:19:30 -0000 Yes it is a bug...CSCdz17325. Fixed in 12.2(13.4)T and later. Dennis Tassos Chatzithomaoglou [achatz@forthnet.gr] wrote: > IOS (tm) 5300 Software (C5300-IS-M), Version 12.2(13)T3, RELEASE SOFTWARE > (fc2) > > dial-ath-25#wr mem > Building configuration... > This command has no effect on this line; use modem AT commands instead > <--------- > [OK] > > > Is this supposed to be a bug? > > -- > *********************************** > Chatzithomaoglou Anastasios > Network Design & Operations Center > FORTHnet S.A. > > *********************************** > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nas mailing list > cisco-nas@puck.nether.net > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nas -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- || || Dennis Peng || || Cisco Systems, Inc. Escalation Engineer |||| |||| 170 West Tasman Drive Phone: (408) 526-6143 ..:||||||:..:||||||:.. San Jose, CA 95134 Fax: (408) 232-2343 Cisco Systems Inc. dpeng@cisco.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- From Michel.Lanners@Cetrel.LU Wed Apr 23 12:53:13 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be merlin.cetrel.lu puck.NOSPAM (Floyd.cetrel.lu [193.168.2.131]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h3NGrBM3014000 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 12:53:12 -0400 Received: (from root@localhost) by merlin.cetrel.lu id SAA05700 for cisco-nas@puck.nether.net; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 18:53:58 +0200 (METDST) Sender: Michel.Lanners@Cetrel.LU Message-ID: <3EA6C522.78960D21@cetrel.lu> Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 18:53:54 +0200 From: Michel Lanners Organization: Cetrel S.C. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; HP-UX B.11.00 9000/800) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [cisco-nas] Bug in modem stats? X-BeenThere: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: list for cisco NAS users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 16:53:13 -0000 This electronic message is not binding on its sender nor on Cetrel S.C. Any use of information of this mail except the use by the addressee within his or her business relation with Cetrel is strictly forbidden CETREL S.C. L-2956 Luxembourg; Tel: 00352 35566-1; http://www.cetrel.lu ======================================================================= Hi all, I'm suspecting an off-by-one bug in the NextPort modem connect speed stats: nikon#sh spe modem summary Async1/00 - 1/107, TTY216 - 323 125668 incoming completes 132 incoming failures 0 outgoing completes 0 outgoing failures 0 failed dial attempts 0 ring no answers 0 autotests 0 no carriers 0 dial timeouts 0 autotest fails 0 no dial tones 0 link failures 0 fail count 0 watchdog timeouts 0 protocol errors 0 recovers Transmit Speed Counters : Speed Calls Speed Calls Speed Calls Speed Calls Speed Calls 60000 0 48000 0 38400 0 30667 0 12000 4 58000 0 46667 0 38000 0 29333 0 9600 0 56000 0 46000 0 37333 0 28800 0 7200 198 54667 0 45333 0 36000 0 28000 0 4800 0 54000 0 44000 0 34667 0 26400 0 2400 0 53333 0 42667 0 34000 0 24000 0 1200 0 52000 0 42000 0 33600 0 21600 0 300 125464 50667 0 41333 0 33333 0 19200 0 50000 0 40000 0 32000 0 16800 0 49333 0 38667 0 31200 0 14400 0 Receive Speed Counters : Speed Calls Speed Calls Speed Calls Speed Calls Speed Calls 38400 0 26400 0 16800 0 7200 0 300 2 33600 0 24000 0 14400 4 4800 0 31200 0 21600 0 12000 0 2400 0 28800 0 19200 0 9600 198 1200 125464 See the transmit counters? I am quite sure the incoming calls are mostly 1200/1200 with a few beeing at other speeds; but the stats show them at 300. also, notice a few calls at 7200 (not 9600) and at 12000 (but not 14400). Known bug? Cheers Michel -- Michel Lanners | "Being able to break security PRO-SSC | doesn't make you a hacker michel.lanners@cetrel.lu | more than being able to hotwire cars Cetrel S.C. | makes you an automotive engineer." 10, Parc d'Activite Syrdall | L-5365 Munsbach | Eric S. Raymond From mitaylor@cisco.com Wed Apr 23 18:13:30 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be no-worries.cisco.com puck.NOSPAM (no-less.cisco.com [64.104.206.252]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h3NMDSM3005400 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 18:13:29 -0400 Received: from mitaylor-w2k.cisco.com (syd-vpn-client-254-45.cisco.com [10.66.254.45])h3NMHBZ13239; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 08:17:11 +1000 (EST) Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.0.20030424080818.0791af78@no-worries.cisco.com> X-Sender: mitaylor@no-worries.cisco.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 08:14:12 +1000 To: "Harald Astrand" From: "Michael Taylor (mitaylor)" Subject: Re: [cisco-nas] Callback with Microsoft IAS (RADIUS) In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed cc: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-BeenThere: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: list for cisco NAS users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 22:13:31 -0000 Hi, I've done some work a while back on Callback, here's the RADIUS profile I was using: callback Auth-Type := Local, User-Password == "testing" Service-Type = Framed-User, Framed-IP-Address = 192.168.1.1, Cisco-AVPair = "lcp:callback-dialstring=1234567", Cisco-AVPair = "lcp:nocallback-verify=1", Cisco-AVPair = "ip:addr=192.168.1.1", Fall-Through = Yes I was working on authentication issues with 12.2T, and haven't actually tried it on 12.0(7)T, but I can load it up for a test when I get into the office if you like... Cheers, Mike At 03:20 PM Wednesday 23/04/2003 +0200, Harald Astrand wrote: >Hi, > >I am trying to get callback working on an AS5200 (12.0.7(T)) using RADIUS. >The AAA server used is a Windows 2000 Server running IAS. > >On the AS5200 I have the following AAA configuration: > >aaa new-model >aaa group server radius RASGROUP > server 10.168.10.13 auth-port 1645 acct-port 1646 > server 10.168.10.14 auth-port 1645 acct-port 1646 >! >aaa authentication login RAS group RASGROUP >aaa authentication ppp RAS group RASGROUP >aaa authorization exec RAS group RASGROUP >aaa authorization network RAS group RASGROUP >aaa accounting exec RAS start-stop group RASGROUP >aaa accounting network RAS start-stop group RASGROUP > >interface Group-Async 1 > ppp authentication pap RAS > ppp authorization RAS > ppp accounting RAS > >I have set us the policy in IAS to return the following parameters: > >Framed-Protocol=PPP >Service-Type=Framed (there does not seem to be any service-type called >Framed-User) >Cisco-AV-Pair="lcp:callback-dialstring=12345678" > >Unfortunately, I am not able to get this to work. Are there any more >parameters that I have to return to the NAS? >Also, if possible I would like to specify the callback number in the user >profile (and not in a AV-pair) > >Any help would be greatly appreciated! > >Regards, > >Harald > >_______________________________________________ >cisco-nas mailing list >cisco-nas@puck.nether.net >http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nas Cisco Systems VGDBU - Voice Gateway and Dial Business Unit Customer Engineering Sydney, Australia Ph: (+61 2) 8446 6044 Mobile: (+61) 401 890 474 From mitaylor@cisco.com Wed Apr 23 23:10:28 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be no-worries.cisco.com puck.NOSPAM (no-less.cisco.com [64.104.206.252]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h3O3APM3022559 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 23:10:26 -0400 Received: from mitaylor-w2k.cisco.com (dhcp-64-104-207-135.cisco.com [64.104.207.135])h3O3E9Z27162; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 13:14:09 +1000 (EST) Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.0.20030424130357.07aec840@no-worries.cisco.com> X-Sender: mitaylor@no-worries.cisco.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 13:11:00 +1000 To: "Michael Taylor (mitaylor)" From: "Michael Taylor (mitaylor)" Subject: Re: [cisco-nas] Callback with Microsoft IAS (RADIUS) In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.0.20030424080818.0791af78@no-worries.cisco.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed cc: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-BeenThere: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: list for cisco NAS users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 03:10:28 -0000 OK, I've just set this up in my lab using a 5300 and 12.0(7)T, with Merit RADIUS running on a SUN box. I did have a couple of issues getting it to work, and I think you are probably running into: CSCdv58818: MS Callback fails without dialer in-band if async-mode ... This DDTS is fixed in 12.2(7), 12.2(7)T etc. BUT, I wouldn't recommend the pain of upgrading, the workaround is to add 'dialer in-band' to your 'interface Group-Async' **** WARNING adding 'dialer in-band' will set the idle timeout for all async users to the default of 120 seconds, so you will probably want to add 'dialer idle-timeout 2147483' or something similar. *** ALSO, you will need to add a chat script for dialing out. (see config) I used the same RADIUS profile as below, and here is the bare bones config of my 5300 to get callback working; Please let me know if you need any more help with this Cheers, Mike Taylor ************************************************************ Current configuration: ! version 12.0 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname vgdbu-5300 ! aaa new-model aaa group server radius default server 2.2.2.2 auth-port 1812 acct-port 1813 ! aaa authentication login default none aaa authentication ppp default group radius aaa authorization network default group radius enable password BLAH ! ! ! resource-pool disable ! ! ! ! ! ip subnet-zero ! isdn switch-type primary-net5 isdn voice-call-failure 0 chat-script callback ABORT ERROR "" "ATDT\T" TIMEOUT 90 CONNECT \c mta receive maximum-recipients 0 ! ! controller E1 0 clock source line primary pri-group timeslots 1-31 ! controller E1 1 clock source line secondary 1 ! controller E1 2 ! controller E1 3 ! ! ! ! interface Ethernet0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! interface Serial0:15 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast isdn switch-type primary-net5 isdn incoming-voice modem fair-queue 64 256 0 no cdp enable ! interface FastEthernet0 ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast duplex full speed 100 ! interface Group-Async0 ip unnumbered FastEthernet0 no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation ppp dialer in-band dialer idle-timeout 2147483 async mode dedicated ppp callback accept ppp authentication chap pap group-range 1 72 ! ip classless no ip http server ! ! radius-server host 2.2.2.2 auth-port 1812 acct-port 1813 key cisco ! line con 0 transport input none line 1 72 script callback callback modem InOut transport preferred lat pad telnet rlogin udptn v120 lapb-ta transport output lat pad telnet rlogin udptn v120 lapb-ta line aux 0 line vty 0 4 exec-timeout 0 0 ! end At 08:14 AM Thursday 24/04/2003 +1000, Michael Taylor (mitaylor) wrote: >Hi, > >I've done some work a while back on Callback, here's the RADIUS profile I >was using: > >callback Auth-Type := Local, User-Password == "testing" > Service-Type = Framed-User, > Framed-IP-Address = 192.168.1.1, > Cisco-AVPair = "lcp:callback-dialstring=1234567", > Cisco-AVPair = "lcp:nocallback-verify=1", > Cisco-AVPair = "ip:addr=192.168.1.1", > Fall-Through = Yes > >I was working on authentication issues with 12.2T, and haven't actually >tried it on 12.0(7)T, but I can load it up for a test when I get into the >office if you like... > >Cheers, >Mike > >At 03:20 PM Wednesday 23/04/2003 +0200, Harald Astrand wrote: > > > > >>Hi, >> >>I am trying to get callback working on an AS5200 (12.0.7(T)) using RADIUS. >>The AAA server used is a Windows 2000 Server running IAS. >> >>On the AS5200 I have the following AAA configuration: >> >>aaa new-model >>aaa group server radius RASGROUP >> server 10.168.10.13 auth-port 1645 acct-port 1646 >> server 10.168.10.14 auth-port 1645 acct-port 1646 >>! >>aaa authentication login RAS group RASGROUP >>aaa authentication ppp RAS group RASGROUP >>aaa authorization exec RAS group RASGROUP >>aaa authorization network RAS group RASGROUP >>aaa accounting exec RAS start-stop group RASGROUP >>aaa accounting network RAS start-stop group RASGROUP >> >>interface Group-Async 1 >> ppp authentication pap RAS >> ppp authorization RAS >> ppp accounting RAS >> >>I have set us the policy in IAS to return the following parameters: >> >>Framed-Protocol=PPP >>Service-Type=Framed (there does not seem to be any service-type called >>Framed-User) >>Cisco-AV-Pair="lcp:callback-dialstring=12345678" >> >>Unfortunately, I am not able to get this to work. Are there any more >>parameters that I have to return to the NAS? >>Also, if possible I would like to specify the callback number in the user >>profile (and not in a AV-pair) >> >>Any help would be greatly appreciated! >> >>Regards, >> >>Harald >> >>_______________________________________________ >>cisco-nas mailing list >>cisco-nas@puck.nether.net >>http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nas > >Cisco Systems >VGDBU - Voice Gateway and Dial Business Unit >Customer Engineering >Sydney, Australia >Ph: (+61 2) 8446 6044 >Mobile: (+61) 401 890 474 > >_______________________________________________ >cisco-nas mailing list >cisco-nas@puck.nether.net >http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nas Cisco Systems VGDBU - Voice Gateway and Dial Business Unit Customer Engineering Sydney, Australia Ph: (+61 2) 8446 6044 Mobile: (+61) 401 890 474 From astrand@unicc.org Thu Apr 24 11:56:55 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be aludra.unicc.org puck.NOSPAM (smtpextout.unicc.org [193.194.138.76]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h3OFusM3017001 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 11:56:54 -0400 Received: from adara.unicc.org (smtpscanout [192.168.202.41]) h3OFva523529; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 17:57:37 +0200 Received: from sanga.unicc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])h3OFvaT04390; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 17:57:36 +0200 Received: from hermes.unicc.org ([192.168.46.100])h3OFval09418; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 17:57:36 +0200 Subject: Re: [cisco-nas] Callback with Microsoft IAS (RADIUS) To: "Michael Taylor (mitaylor)" X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.07a May 14, 2001 Message-ID: From: "Harald Astrand" Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 17:47:04 +0200 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on Hermes/Mail/SRV/ICC(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 04/24/2003 05:47:05 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-BeenThere: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: list for cisco NAS users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 15:56:55 -0000 Thank you very much for the information! I actually already had the "dialer in-band" (and dialer idle-timeout) defined for the group-async interface. I found on CCO that only in version 12.1(7) the RADIUS attribute 19 for Microsoft callback is supported. I guess this means that I can not specify the phone number in the user properties in Active Directory. However, I assume that callback should work if I define the AV-pair "lcp:callback-dialstring=1234567". Unfortunately, I will not have time to troubleshoot any more until next week. Thanks again for your help! Regards, Harald "Michael Taylor To: "Michael Taylor (mitaylor)" (mitaylor)" cc: "Harald Astrand" , cisco-nas@puck.nether.net 04/24/2003 05:11 AM OK, I've just set this up in my lab using a 5300 and 12.0(7)T, with Merit RADIUS running on a SUN box. I did have a couple of issues getting it to work, and I think you are probably running into: CSCdv58818: MS Callback fails without dialer in-band if async-mode ... This DDTS is fixed in 12.2(7), 12.2(7)T etc. BUT, I wouldn't recommend the pain of upgrading, the workaround is to add 'dialer in-band' to your 'interface Group-Async' **** WARNING adding 'dialer in-band' will set the idle timeout for all async users to the default of 120 seconds, so you will probably want to add 'dialer idle-timeout 2147483' or something similar. *** ALSO, you will need to add a chat script for dialing out. (see config) I used the same RADIUS profile as below, and here is the bare bones config of my 5300 to get callback working; Please let me know if you need any more help with this Cheers, Mike Taylor ************************************************************ Current configuration: ! version 12.0 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname vgdbu-5300 ! aaa new-model aaa group server radius default server 2.2.2.2 auth-port 1812 acct-port 1813 ! aaa authentication login default none aaa authentication ppp default group radius aaa authorization network default group radius enable password BLAH ! ! ! resource-pool disable ! ! ! ! ! ip subnet-zero ! isdn switch-type primary-net5 isdn voice-call-failure 0 chat-script callback ABORT ERROR "" "ATDT\T" TIMEOUT 90 CONNECT \c mta receive maximum-recipients 0 ! ! controller E1 0 clock source line primary pri-group timeslots 1-31 ! controller E1 1 clock source line secondary 1 ! controller E1 2 ! controller E1 3 ! ! ! ! interface Ethernet0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! interface Serial0:15 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast isdn switch-type primary-net5 isdn incoming-voice modem fair-queue 64 256 0 no cdp enable ! interface FastEthernet0 ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast duplex full speed 100 ! interface Group-Async0 ip unnumbered FastEthernet0 no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation ppp dialer in-band dialer idle-timeout 2147483 async mode dedicated ppp callback accept ppp authentication chap pap group-range 1 72 ! ip classless no ip http server ! ! radius-server host 2.2.2.2 auth-port 1812 acct-port 1813 key cisco ! line con 0 transport input none line 1 72 script callback callback modem InOut transport preferred lat pad telnet rlogin udptn v120 lapb-ta transport output lat pad telnet rlogin udptn v120 lapb-ta line aux 0 line vty 0 4 exec-timeout 0 0 ! end At 08:14 AM Thursday 24/04/2003 +1000, Michael Taylor (mitaylor) wrote: >Hi, > >I've done some work a while back on Callback, here's the RADIUS profile I >was using: > >callback Auth-Type := Local, User-Password == "testing" > Service-Type = Framed-User, > Framed-IP-Address = 192.168.1.1, > Cisco-AVPair = "lcp:callback-dialstring=1234567", > Cisco-AVPair = "lcp:nocallback-verify=1", > Cisco-AVPair = "ip:addr=192.168.1.1", > Fall-Through = Yes > >I was working on authentication issues with 12.2T, and haven't actually >tried it on 12.0(7)T, but I can load it up for a test when I get into the >office if you like... > >Cheers, >Mike > >At 03:20 PM Wednesday 23/04/2003 +0200, Harald Astrand wrote: > > > > >>Hi, >> >>I am trying to get callback working on an AS5200 (12.0.7(T)) using RADIUS. >>The AAA server used is a Windows 2000 Server running IAS. >> >>On the AS5200 I have the following AAA configuration: >> >>aaa new-model >>aaa group server radius RASGROUP >> server 10.168.10.13 auth-port 1645 acct-port 1646 >> server 10.168.10.14 auth-port 1645 acct-port 1646 >>! >>aaa authentication login RAS group RASGROUP >>aaa authentication ppp RAS group RASGROUP >>aaa authorization exec RAS group RASGROUP >>aaa authorization network RAS group RASGROUP >>aaa accounting exec RAS start-stop group RASGROUP >>aaa accounting network RAS start-stop group RASGROUP >> >>interface Group-Async 1 >> ppp authentication pap RAS >> ppp authorization RAS >> ppp accounting RAS >> >>I have set us the policy in IAS to return the following parameters: >> >>Framed-Protocol=PPP >>Service-Type=Framed (there does not seem to be any service-type called >>Framed-User) >>Cisco-AV-Pair="lcp:callback-dialstring=12345678" >> >>Unfortunately, I am not able to get this to work. Are there any more >>parameters that I have to return to the NAS? >>Also, if possible I would like to specify the callback number in the user >>profile (and not in a AV-pair) >> >>Any help would be greatly appreciated! >> >>Regards, >> >>Harald >> >>_______________________________________________ >>cisco-nas mailing list >>cisco-nas@puck.nether.net >>http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nas > >Cisco Systems >VGDBU - Voice Gateway and Dial Business Unit >Customer Engineering >Sydney, Australia >Ph: (+61 2) 8446 6044 >Mobile: (+61) 401 890 474 > >_______________________________________________ >cisco-nas mailing list >cisco-nas@puck.nether.net >http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nas Cisco Systems VGDBU - Voice Gateway and Dial Business Unit Customer Engineering Sydney, Australia Ph: (+61 2) 8446 6044 Mobile: (+61) 401 890 474 From mihi@ludens.elte.hu Thu Apr 24 12:07:44 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be cache1.synergon.hu puck.NOSPAM (cache.synergon.hu [194.149.60.26]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with SMTP id h3OG7hM3018121 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 12:07:44 -0400 Received: (qmail 20383 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2003 16:08:40 -0000 Received: from kozos.synergon.hu (HELO sun.synergon.hu) (194.149.60.33) by cache.synergon.hu with SMTP; 24 Apr 2003 16:08:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 24033 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2003 16:08:40 -0000 Received: from mihi.net.synergon.hu (HELO brainwashed) (172.23.129.1) by sun.synergon.hu with SMTP; 24 Apr 2003 16:08:40 -0000 From: mihi@ludens.elte.hu To: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net, cisco-voice@external.cisco.com Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 18:08:17 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <3EA82811.17479.5CE6039@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.02a) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body Subject: [cisco-nas] RE: how to get the number of DS0 currently in use per T1? X-BeenThere: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: mihi@ludens.elte.hu List-Id: list for cisco NAS users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 16:07:45 -0000 Hello all, I reviewed my archives of the list and everyone seems to be using the CISCO-POP- MGMT-MIB for this. I've got 3640s with E1 on NM-HDV as voice gateway and the ActiveDS0s always returns zeros. IOS is 12.2 mainline. What MIB do you recommend? Thanks, Martin On 15 Oct 2001 at 22:00, Yuval Ben-Ari wrote: | It's definitely possible: | use this OID: | cpmDS1ActiveDS0s .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.10.19.1.1.9.1.3 | | While adding 2 digits which represent the Controller. | | For example, controller E1 4 will be: | .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.10.19.1.1.9.1.3(.0.4) | | on 5400: | E1 6/7 will be: .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.10.19.1.1.9.1.3.6.7 | | | | -----Original Message----- | From: Sasaki Futoshi [mailto:f-sasaki@iij.ad.jp] | Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 12:55 | To: cisco-nas@external.cisco.com | Subject: how to get the number of DS0 currently in use per T1? | | | Hi, | | Now I try to manage our AS5300s by using SNMP. | Can anyone tell me how to get the number of DS0s currently in use per | T1? | I saw CCO document below but could not find appropriate MIB. | | http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/intsolns/dialsol/nmssol | /dialmib.htm | | Thanks, From qmailindia@yahoo.com Fri May 2 11:13:54 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be web12701.mail.yahoo.com puck.NOSPAM (web12701.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.173.238]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with SMTP id h42FDrM3002783 for ; Fri, 2 May 2003 11:13:53 -0400 Message-ID: <20030502151357.40046.qmail@web12701.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [203.187.192.57] by web12701.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 02 May 2003 08:13:57 PDT Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 08:13:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Nilesh Naik To: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-nas] Missing Calling-Station-ID in Access-Request X-BeenThere: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: list for cisco NAS users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 15:13:54 -0000 Hi all we rae using cisco uBR 7246, as our PPPoE concentrator and NAS , we are running IOS (tm) 7200 Software (UBR7200-IK8S-M), Version 12.2(11)BC3, EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) on this uBR , we are presently using the Radius Authentication for all the PPPoE dialin Users , but when i see in the debug mode by enabling "debug radius", debug aaa authentication" & "debug aaa accounting" i cant see cisco uBR sending "Calling-Station-Id" attribute to the radius , which i think sould contain value of the customer's MAC Address if i am correct ?? pls correct me if i am wrong here ? now i check out every option on the Ubr to enable this i even tried these following commands aaa group server radius accountgroup server 20.17.92.2 auth-port 1645 acct-port 1646 server 20.17.92.1 auth-port 1645 acct-port 1646 authorization accept default ( added this command) ! then radius-server attribute list default and also added "calling-station-ID" attribute under attribute list (Default the one created by above command) than also i cant see cisco uBR our NAS sending the Calling-Station-ID to the radius server , i even tried doing this my-cmts02(config)#radius-server attribute ? 11 Filter-Id attribute configuration 188 Num-In-Multilink attribute configuration 218 Address-Pool attribute 32 NAS-Identifier attribute 4 NAS IP address attribute 44 Acct-Session-Id attribute 6 Service-Type attribute 69 Tunnel-Password attribute 8 Framed IP address attribute list List of Attribute Types nas-port NAS-Port attribute configuration but as u see there isnt any thing mentioned for "calling-station-ID" (31) so i was not able to enable it , so if any one knows anything about this then kindly let me know what i am missing here ? what should i do to enable it so that it starts sending calling-station-ID attribute? regards Prashant __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com From qmailindia@yahoo.com Fri May 2 11:14:06 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be web12704.mail.yahoo.com puck.NOSPAM (web12704.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.173.241]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with SMTP id h42FE5M3002817 for ; Fri, 2 May 2003 11:14:06 -0400 Message-ID: <20030502151409.87119.qmail@web12704.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [203.187.192.57] by web12704.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 02 May 2003 08:14:09 PDT Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 08:14:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Nilesh Naik To: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-nas] Missing Calling-Station-ID in Access-Request X-BeenThere: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: list for cisco NAS users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 15:14:07 -0000 Hi all we rae using cisco uBR 7246, as our PPPoE concentrator and NAS , we are running IOS (tm) 7200 Software (UBR7200-IK8S-M), Version 12.2(11)BC3, EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) on this uBR , we are presently using the Radius Authentication for all the PPPoE dialin Users , but when i see in the debug mode by enabling "debug radius", debug aaa authentication" & "debug aaa accounting" i cant see cisco uBR sending "Calling-Station-Id" attribute to the radius , which i think sould contain value of the customer's MAC Address if i am correct ?? pls correct me if i am wrong here ? now i check out every option on the Ubr to enable this i even tried these following commands aaa group server radius accountgroup server 20.17.92.2 auth-port 1645 acct-port 1646 server 20.17.92.1 auth-port 1645 acct-port 1646 authorization accept default ( added this command) ! then radius-server attribute list default and also added "calling-station-ID" attribute under attribute list (Default the one created by above command) than also i cant see cisco uBR our NAS sending the Calling-Station-ID to the radius server , i even tried doing this my-cmts02(config)#radius-server attribute ? 11 Filter-Id attribute configuration 188 Num-In-Multilink attribute configuration 218 Address-Pool attribute 32 NAS-Identifier attribute 4 NAS IP address attribute 44 Acct-Session-Id attribute 6 Service-Type attribute 69 Tunnel-Password attribute 8 Framed IP address attribute list List of Attribute Types nas-port NAS-Port attribute configuration but as u see there isnt any thing mentioned for "calling-station-ID" (31) so i was not able to enable it , so if any one knows anything about this then kindly let me know what i am missing here ? what should i do to enable it so that it starts sending calling-station-ID attribute? regards Prashant __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com From qmailindia@yahoo.com Fri May 2 12:19:33 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be web12708.mail.yahoo.com puck.NOSPAM (web12708.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.173.245]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with SMTP id h42GJWM3007545 for ; Fri, 2 May 2003 12:19:32 -0400 Message-ID: <20030502161936.60597.qmail@web12708.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [203.187.192.57] by web12708.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 02 May 2003 09:19:36 PDT Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 09:19:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Nilesh Naik To: Adeel Ahmed , cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net In-Reply-To: <20030502161009.90288.qmail@web12104.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-nas] Re: [c-ubr] Missing Calling-Station-ID in Access-Request X-BeenThere: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: list for cisco NAS users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 16:19:34 -0000 Hi Thanx a lot , but unfortunately i tried that too couple of times but that too didt worked , i do not have the cco passwd so if you dont mind request you to copy-paste that part from the web page , warm regards Prashant --- Adeel Ahmed wrote: > I think you will need to configure the following > commands to get this working: > > radius-server vsa send accounting > > radius-server vsa send authentication > > > Take a look at the following example for reference: > > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1839/products_feature_guide_chapter09186a00800b5de5.html > > Eventhough the example is not from a uBR7246 you can > see the NAS(AS5300) sending radius attribute 31 to > the > radius-server. > > Hope this helps ! > > Adeel. > > --- Nilesh Naik wrote: > > Hi all > > > > we rae using cisco uBR 7246, as our PPPoE > > concentrator and NAS , we are running IOS (tm) > 7200 > > Software (UBR7200-IK8S-M), Version 12.2(11)BC3, > > EARLY > > DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) on this uBR , > > > > we are presently using the Radius > Authentication > > for all the PPPoE dialin Users , but when i see in > > the > > debug mode by enabling "debug radius", debug aaa > > authentication" & "debug aaa accounting" i cant > see > > cisco uBR sending "Calling-Station-Id" attribute > to > > the radius , which i think sould contain value of > > the > > customer's MAC Address if i am correct ?? pls > > correct > > me if i am wrong here ? > > > > now i check out every option on the Ubr to > enable > > this i even tried these following commands > > > > aaa group server radius accountgroup > > server 20.17.92.2 auth-port 1645 acct-port 1646 > > server 20.17.92.1 auth-port 1645 acct-port 1646 > > authorization accept default ( added this > command) > > ! > > then > > radius-server attribute list default > > > > and also added "calling-station-ID" attribute > under > > attribute list (Default the one created by above > > command) > > > > > > than also i cant see cisco uBR our NAS sending the > > Calling-Station-ID to the radius server , > > > > i even tried doing this > > > > my-cmts02(config)#radius-server attribute ? > > 11 Filter-Id attribute configuration > > 188 Num-In-Multilink attribute > configuration > > 218 Address-Pool attribute > > 32 NAS-Identifier attribute > > 4 NAS IP address attribute > > 44 Acct-Session-Id attribute > > 6 Service-Type attribute > > 69 Tunnel-Password attribute > > 8 Framed IP address attribute > > list List of Attribute Types > > nas-port NAS-Port attribute configuration > > > > > > but as u see there isnt any thing mentioned for > > "calling-station-ID" (31) so i was not able to > > enable > > it , > > > > > > so if any one knows anything about this then > > kindly > > let me know what i am missing here ? what should i > > do > > to enable it so that it starts sending > > calling-station-ID attribute? > > > > regards > > Prashant > > > > __________________________________ > > Do you Yahoo!? > > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. > > http://search.yahoo.com > > _______________________________________________ > > cisco-ubr mailing list > > cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net > > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-ubr > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. > http://search.yahoo.com __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com From dpeng@cisco.com Fri May 2 17:27:59 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be sj-core-2.cisco.com puck.NOSPAM (sj-core-2.cisco.com [171.71.177.254]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h42LRwM3026300; Fri, 2 May 2003 17:27:59 -0400 Received: from sj-cse-320.cisco.com (sj-cse-320.cisco.com [171.69.88.101]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h42LRxxI005675; Fri, 2 May 2003 14:27:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from dpeng@localhost) by sj-cse-320.cisco.com (8.11.7+Sun/8.11.6) id h42LRvc29304; Fri, 2 May 2003 14:27:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 14:27:57 -0700 From: Dennis Peng To: Nilesh Naik Subject: Re: [cisco-nas] Missing Calling-Station-ID in Access-Request Message-ID: <20030502212756.GH26822@sj-cse-320.cisco.com> References: <20030502151357.40046.qmail@web12701.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030502151357.40046.qmail@web12701.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net cc: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net X-BeenThere: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: list for cisco NAS users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 21:28:00 -0000 We don't send the MAC address in the Calling-Station-Id field. We do send it in a Cisco VSA called "client-mac-address" though, but you need CSCdw44464 which is not in your version of code. It doesn't look like there is any uBR release which has this feature in it right now. Dennis Nilesh Naik [qmailindia@yahoo.com] wrote: > Hi all > > we rae using cisco uBR 7246, as our PPPoE > concentrator and NAS , we are running IOS (tm) 7200 > Software (UBR7200-IK8S-M), Version 12.2(11)BC3, EARLY > DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) on this uBR , > > we are presently using the Radius Authentication > for all the PPPoE dialin Users , but when i see in the > debug mode by enabling "debug radius", debug aaa > authentication" & "debug aaa accounting" i cant see > cisco uBR sending "Calling-Station-Id" attribute to > the radius , which i think sould contain value of the > customer's MAC Address if i am correct ?? pls correct > me if i am wrong here ? > > now i check out every option on the Ubr to enable > this i even tried these following commands > > aaa group server radius accountgroup > server 20.17.92.2 auth-port 1645 acct-port 1646 > server 20.17.92.1 auth-port 1645 acct-port 1646 > authorization accept default ( added this command) > ! > then > radius-server attribute list default > > and also added "calling-station-ID" attribute under > attribute list (Default the one created by above > command) > > > than also i cant see cisco uBR our NAS sending the > Calling-Station-ID to the radius server , > > i even tried doing this > > my-cmts02(config)#radius-server attribute ? > 11 Filter-Id attribute configuration > 188 Num-In-Multilink attribute configuration > 218 Address-Pool attribute > 32 NAS-Identifier attribute > 4 NAS IP address attribute > 44 Acct-Session-Id attribute > 6 Service-Type attribute > 69 Tunnel-Password attribute > 8 Framed IP address attribute > list List of Attribute Types > nas-port NAS-Port attribute configuration > > > but as u see there isnt any thing mentioned for > "calling-station-ID" (31) so i was not able to enable > it , > > > so if any one knows anything about this then kindly > let me know what i am missing here ? what should i do > to enable it so that it starts sending > calling-station-ID attribute? > > regards > Prashant > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. > http://search.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nas mailing list > cisco-nas@puck.nether.net > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nas -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- || || Dennis Peng || || Cisco Systems, Inc. Escalation Engineer |||| |||| 170 West Tasman Drive Phone: (408) 526-6143 ..:||||||:..:||||||:.. San Jose, CA 95134 Fax: (408) 232-2343 Cisco Systems Inc. dpeng@cisco.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- From mihi@ludens.elte.hu Thu May 8 09:23:45 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be cache1.synergon.hu puck.NOSPAM (cache.synergon.hu [194.149.60.26]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with SMTP id h48DNhfD030202 for ; Thu, 8 May 2003 09:23:44 -0400 Received: (qmail 27047 invoked from network); 8 May 2003 13:23:49 -0000 Received: from kozos.synergon.hu (HELO sun.synergon.hu) (194.149.60.33) by cache.synergon.hu with SMTP; 8 May 2003 13:23:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 19523 invoked from network); 8 May 2003 13:23:49 -0000 Received: from mihi.net.synergon.hu (HELO brainwashed) (172.23.129.1) by sun.synergon.hu with SMTP; 8 May 2003 13:23:49 -0000 From: mihi@ludens.elte.hu To: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 15:23:38 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <3EBA767A.8701.4FC3E9F@localhost> Priority: normal References: "Your message dated Mon, 27 Jan 2003 12:21:25 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)" In-reply-to: <01KRQBWG1KTG8WWXV1@Cisco.COM> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.02a) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body Subject: [cisco-nas] Re: IOS version for 5350 X-BeenThere: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: mihi@ludens.elte.hu List-Id: list for cisco NAS users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 13:23:45 -0000 Hello all, I have an 5350 with 12.2(2)XB10 which I also thought is stable but has continuously: May 8 15:20:46.650: %SCHED-3-THRASHING: Process thrashing on watched message event. -Process= "TTY Background", ipl= 4, pid= 25 -Traceback= 604358A8 60435EE4 603935F0 6041BAF4 6041BAE0 Do you think 12.2(11)T8 should be better? Thanks, Marton On 27 Jan 2003 at 13:20, Aaron Leonard wrote: | In general, the XB branch is considered to be the "stable" branch | for V.92 dial applications on the AS5000 routers. The final | installment in the XB branch is scheduled to be XB11 which is | due out in a week or so I think. | | 12.2(11)T is considered to be the next stable branch for dial. | 12.2(13)T is relatively risky at this point. | | Aaron | | --- | | > Hi, | > I'm currently running 12.2(2)XA5 in my 5350s and want to upgrade. It appears | > that this release is the last in the XA chain so XB or T are my choices. | > Any comments/experience with XB or T? 13T and XB10 are about a month old....are | > they and their bundled modem code stable? | | > ........thanks in advance.......J | | > James Savage York University | > Senior Com. Tech. 108 Steacie Bldg. | > jsavage@yorku.ca 4700 Keele Street | > phone: 416-736-2100 ext.22605 Toronto, Ontario | > fax: 416-736-5701 M3J 1P3, CANADA | > /\ /\ /\ /\ | > / \ / \ / \ / \ | > \ / \ / \ / | > \/ \/ \/ | | From qmailindia@yahoo.com Fri May 9 09:59:27 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be web12706.mail.yahoo.com puck.NOSPAM (web12706.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.173.243]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with SMTP id h49DxQCe006226 for ; Fri, 9 May 2003 09:59:27 -0400 Message-ID: <20030509135940.88843.qmail@web12706.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [203.187.192.57] by web12706.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 09 May 2003 06:59:40 PDT Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 06:59:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Nilesh Naik To: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: [cisco-nas] Cisco VOIP Solutions X-BeenThere: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: list for cisco NAS users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 13:59:27 -0000 Hi all if some one had any experience or in fo thenkindly let me know which protocols and port numbers cisco IP phones and cisco call Manager, regards Prashant __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com From ctrieu@cisco.com Fri May 9 13:04:27 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be sj-core-5.cisco.com puck.NOSPAM (sj-core-5.cisco.com [171.71.177.238]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h49H4QCe028003 for ; Fri, 9 May 2003 13:04:27 -0400 Received: from ctrieu-w2k01.cisco.com (dhcp-171-69-104-61.cisco.com [171.69.104.61]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h49H4ZGg002258; Fri, 9 May 2003 10:04:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20030509095842.02945860@ce-nfs-1.cisco.com> X-Sender: ctrieu@ce-nfs-1.cisco.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 10:04:36 -0700 To: Nilesh Naik From: Chinh Trieu Subject: Re: [cisco-nas] Cisco VOIP Solutions In-Reply-To: <20030509135940.88843.qmail@web12706.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed cc: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-BeenThere: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: list for cisco NAS users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 17:04:27 -0000 Hi, Here are the port information: Cisco CallManager (Call control for Cisco IP Phone) 2000 (TCP) Cisco CallManager (Call control for Cisco Access Analog Gateway) 2002 (TCP) Cisco CallManager (Call control for Cisco Access Digital Gateway) 2001 (TCP) Cisco CallManager (SSAPI) 7727 (TCP) Cisco CallManager (H.225 signaling) 1720 (TCP) Cisco CallManager (line state server) 3224 (UDP) Cisco CallManager (line state port) 3223 (UDP) Cisco CallManager (Q.921 transport) Dynamically assigned UDP range used by Winsock Cisco IP Phone (RTP streaming) Dynamically assigned UDP range 16384 - 32766 Cisco IP Phone (TFTP, DNS) Dynamically assigned UDP range 49152 - 53247 Cisco IP Phone (Call control) Dynamically assigned TCP range 49152 - 53247 Cisco Access Digital DT-24 (Call control) Dynamically assigned TCP range used by Winsock Cisco Access Digital DT-24 (RTP streaming) Dynamically assigned UDP range used by Winsock Cisco Access Digital DT-24 (Q.921 transport) Dynamically assigned UDP range used by Winsock Cisco Access Digital DT-24+/DE-30+ (Call control) Dynamically assigned UDP range 49152 - 53247 Cisco Access Digital DT-24+/DE-30+ (RTP streaming) Dynamically assigned UDP range 16384 - 32766 Cisco Access Digital DT-24+/DE-30+ (Q.921 transport) Dynamically assigned UDP range 49152 - 53247 Cisco Access Analog (RTP streaming) Dynamically assigned UDP range 16384 - 32766 Cisco Access Analog (TFTP, DNS) Dynamically assigned UDP range 49152 - 53247 Cisco Access Analog (Call control) Dynamically assigned TCP range 49152 - 53247 Unicast Conference Bridge (Call control) Dynamically assigned TCP range used by Winsock Multicast Conference Bridge (Call control) Not applicable Unicast Conference Bridge (RTP streaming) Dynamically assigned UDP range used by Winsock Multicast Conference Bridge (RTP streaming) Assigned in Cisco CallManager Administration Media Termination Point (Call control) Dynamically assigned TCP range used by Winsock Media Termination Point (RTP streaming) Dynamically assigned UDP range used by Winsock SIMClient (Call control) 3000 (TCP) SIMClient (RTP) 3000 (UDP) SIMClient1250 (Call control) 3000 (TCP) Remote Proxy (RTP streaming) 2500 and up (UDP) Enterprise Proxy (Call control) Dynamically assigned TCP range used by Winsock Cisco TFTP 69 (UDP) & Dynamically assigned UDP range used by Winsock Hope this helps. Chinh At 06:59 AM 5/9/2003 -0700, Nilesh Naik wrote: >Hi all > > > if some one had any experience or in fo thenkindly >let me know which protocols and port numbers >cisco IP phones and cisco call Manager, > > >regards >Prashant > >__________________________________ >Do you Yahoo!? >The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. >http://search.yahoo.com >_______________________________________________ >cisco-nas mailing list >cisco-nas@puck.nether.net >http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nas From adeel_373@yahoo.com Fri May 2 12:10:06 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be web12104.mail.yahoo.com puck.NOSPAM (web12104.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.172.24]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with SMTP id h42GA5M3006893 for ; Fri, 2 May 2003 12:10:05 -0400 Message-ID: <20030502161009.90288.qmail@web12104.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [128.107.253.39] by web12104.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 02 May 2003 09:10:09 PDT Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 09:10:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Adeel Ahmed To: Nilesh Naik , cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net In-Reply-To: <20030502151409.87119.qmail@web12704.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 17 May 2003 10:32:27 -0400 cc: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-nas] Re: [c-ubr] Missing Calling-Station-ID in Access-Request X-BeenThere: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: list for cisco NAS users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 16:10:06 -0000 I think you will need to configure the following commands to get this working: radius-server vsa send accounting radius-server vsa send authentication Take a look at the following example for reference: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1839/products_feature_guide_chapter09186a00800b5de5.html Eventhough the example is not from a uBR7246 you can see the NAS(AS5300) sending radius attribute 31 to the radius-server. Hope this helps ! Adeel. --- Nilesh Naik wrote: > Hi all > > we rae using cisco uBR 7246, as our PPPoE > concentrator and NAS , we are running IOS (tm) 7200 > Software (UBR7200-IK8S-M), Version 12.2(11)BC3, > EARLY > DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) on this uBR , > > we are presently using the Radius Authentication > for all the PPPoE dialin Users , but when i see in > the > debug mode by enabling "debug radius", debug aaa > authentication" & "debug aaa accounting" i cant see > cisco uBR sending "Calling-Station-Id" attribute to > the radius , which i think sould contain value of > the > customer's MAC Address if i am correct ?? pls > correct > me if i am wrong here ? > > now i check out every option on the Ubr to enable > this i even tried these following commands > > aaa group server radius accountgroup > server 20.17.92.2 auth-port 1645 acct-port 1646 > server 20.17.92.1 auth-port 1645 acct-port 1646 > authorization accept default ( added this command) > ! > then > radius-server attribute list default > > and also added "calling-station-ID" attribute under > attribute list (Default the one created by above > command) > > > than also i cant see cisco uBR our NAS sending the > Calling-Station-ID to the radius server , > > i even tried doing this > > my-cmts02(config)#radius-server attribute ? > 11 Filter-Id attribute configuration > 188 Num-In-Multilink attribute configuration > 218 Address-Pool attribute > 32 NAS-Identifier attribute > 4 NAS IP address attribute > 44 Acct-Session-Id attribute > 6 Service-Type attribute > 69 Tunnel-Password attribute > 8 Framed IP address attribute > list List of Attribute Types > nas-port NAS-Port attribute configuration > > > but as u see there isnt any thing mentioned for > "calling-station-ID" (31) so i was not able to > enable > it , > > > so if any one knows anything about this then > kindly > let me know what i am missing here ? what should i > do > to enable it so that it starts sending > calling-station-ID attribute? > > regards > Prashant > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. > http://search.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > cisco-ubr mailing list > cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-ubr __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com From hutchense@ntelos.net Fri May 2 16:16:35 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be eddie.eng puck.NOSPAM (eddie.eng.cstone.net [209.145.66.33]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h42KGYM3023157 for ; Fri, 2 May 2003 16:16:34 -0400 Received: from ntelos.net (localhost.cstone.net [127.0.0.1]) by eddie.eng (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA04345 for ; Fri, 2 May 2003 16:14:42 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from hutchense@ntelos.net) Sender: eddie@eddie.eng Message-ID: <3EB2D1B2.17012C48@ntelos.net> Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 16:14:42 -0400 From: Edward Hutchens X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 17 May 2003 10:32:27 -0400 Subject: [cisco-nas] Unwanted accounting messages from WebTV? X-BeenThere: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: list for cisco NAS users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 20:16:35 -0000 Hi, I have a couple of AS5300s running 12.1(9) that are gathering accounting information from users authenticating with an unknown radius server. I have a suspicion that this unknown radius server belongs to WebTV as both customers connect through us to use that service. Below you will find my aaa set up, is there anything I can modify in there to make the RAS discard accounting info from radius servers not in the config? aaa new-model aaa authentication login default local group radius aaa authentication login TELNET local aaa authentication ppp default if-needed local group radius aaa authorization exec default group radius local aaa authorization network default group radius aaa accounting delay-start aaa accounting network default start-stop group radius aaa accounting system default wait-start group radius Thanks, Eddie -- Edward Hutchens -=Data Technician=- NTELOS IP routing http://www.ntelos.net From dpeng@cisco.com Tue May 20 18:20:49 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be sj-core-1.cisco.com puck.NOSPAM (sj-core-1.cisco.com [171.71.177.237]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h4KMKnDp004687 for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 18:20:49 -0400 Received: from sj-cse-320.cisco.com (sj-cse-320.cisco.com [171.69.88.101]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h4KML0eS027327; Tue, 20 May 2003 15:21:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from dpeng@localhost) by sj-cse-320.cisco.com (8.11.7+Sun/8.11.6) id h4KML0P00832; Tue, 20 May 2003 15:21:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 15:21:00 -0700 From: Dennis Peng To: Edward Hutchens Subject: Re: [cisco-nas] Unwanted accounting messages from WebTV? Message-ID: <20030520222100.GK29559@sj-cse-320.cisco.com> References: <3EB2D1B2.17012C48@ntelos.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3EB2D1B2.17012C48@ntelos.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-BeenThere: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: list for cisco NAS users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 22:20:50 -0000 I don't think I understand your question. The 5300 doesn't gather accounting information, it only transmits accounting information to the RADIUS server. If any accounting information is being directly transmitted to the 5300, it would be dropped automatically. And how are users authenticating to a RADIUS server you have not defined? Dennis Edward Hutchens [hutchense@ntelos.net] wrote: > Hi, > > I have a couple of AS5300s running 12.1(9) that are gathering > accounting information from users authenticating with an unknown > radius server. I have a suspicion that this unknown radius server > belongs to WebTV as both customers connect through us to use that > service. Below you will find my aaa set up, is there anything I can > modify in there to make the RAS discard accounting info from radius > servers not in the config? > > > aaa new-model > aaa authentication login default local group radius > aaa authentication login TELNET local > aaa authentication ppp default if-needed local group radius > aaa authorization exec default group radius local > aaa authorization network default group radius > aaa accounting delay-start > aaa accounting network default start-stop group radius > aaa accounting system default wait-start group radius > > Thanks, > > Eddie > -- > Edward Hutchens -=Data Technician=- NTELOS IP routing > http://www.ntelos.net > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nas mailing list > cisco-nas@puck.nether.net > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nas -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- || || Dennis Peng || || Cisco Systems, Inc. Escalation Engineer |||| |||| 170 West Tasman Drive Phone: (408) 526-6143 ..:||||||:..:||||||:.. San Jose, CA 95134 Fax: (408) 232-2343 Cisco Systems Inc. dpeng@cisco.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- From achatz@forthnet.gr Wed May 21 08:08:55 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be athsmtp02.forthnet.gr puck.NOSPAM (mail.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.160]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h4LC8sDp013698 for ; Wed, 21 May 2003 08:08:54 -0400 Received: from forthnet.gr ([194.219.203.122]) by athsmtp02.forthnet.gr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Wed, 21 May 2003 15:08:51 +0300 Message-ID: <3ECB6C8E.8010603@forthnet.gr> Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 15:09:50 +0300 From: Tassos Chatzithomaoglou Organization: FORTHnet SA User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02 X-Accept-Language: el, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-7; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 May 2003 12:08:51.0651 (UTC) FILETIME=[BE18A130:01C31F91] Subject: [cisco-nas] ATM/L2TP/PPP MTU question X-BeenThere: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: list for cisco NAS users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 12:08:55 -0000 Here is the network diagram: DSL ATM ATM ATM ETH ADSL CPE ----- DSLAM ----- ATM SWITCH ----- BBRAS ----- LNS ----- INTERNET |-------------- PPPoE/A------------------||----L2TP---| |----------------------- PPP -------------------------| What is the recommended MTU setting for the ip/atm connection between BBRAS/LNS (default for ATM is 4470), if we have to : 1. Do not change anything on user's side 2. Do not load BBRAS/LNS with extra fragmentation/reassembly Should i make it 1540 (1500 + 40 bytes of IP, UDP and L2TP headers) ? -- *********************************** Chatzithomaoglou Anastasios Network Design & Operations Center FORTHnet S.A. *********************************** From achatz@forthnet.gr Wed May 21 08:26:21 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be athsmtp02.forthnet.gr puck.NOSPAM (mail.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.160]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h4LCQKDp015656 for ; Wed, 21 May 2003 08:26:21 -0400 Received: from forthnet.gr ([194.219.203.122]) by athsmtp02.forthnet.gr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Wed, 21 May 2003 15:26:13 +0300 Message-ID: <3ECB70A0.5010407@forthnet.gr> Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 15:27:12 +0300 From: Tassos Chatzithomaoglou Organization: FORTHnet SA User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02 X-Accept-Language: el, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-7; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 May 2003 12:26:13.0849 (UTC) FILETIME=[2B4B6C90:01C31F94] Subject: [cisco-nas] high cpu load on LNS X-BeenThere: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: list for cisco NAS users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 12:26:22 -0000 After reading "High CPU Utilization on Cisco Routers Used as L2TP Termination Points" http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/794/l2tp_highcpu.html on CCO, i still have one question: If i lower the MTU of the LACs (as the document says), will it affect normal users (no vpdn ones) too? If yes, in what way? -- *********************************** Chatzithomaoglou Anastasios Network Design & Operations Center FORTHnet S.A. *********************************** From peder@voralt.net Wed May 21 09:01:15 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be mail.angvall.net puck.NOSPAM ([65.205.112.87]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h4LD1EDp017967 for ; Wed, 21 May 2003 09:01:14 -0400 Received: from threebert (unknown [65.205.112.83]) by mail.angvall.net (Postfix) with SMTP id DAF9D438A for ; Wed, 21 May 2003 08:05:01 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <019d01c31f99$09379200$5370cd41@threebert> From: "Voralt" To: Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 08:01:03 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300 Subject: [cisco-nas] PRI Problem X-BeenThere: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: list for cisco NAS users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 13:01:15 -0000 We have a PRI for ISDN calls and we have been having some problems with certain users for the last 24 hours. Some users can call in and connect and no matter what channel they are on, they work fine (they can drop the call and call back and it works fine). Some users call in and have tons of dropped packets (if they drop and call back, they still have problems). There have been no IOS or config changes for at least a week. The PRI itself is clean, but the individual channels show errors. Any idea what could cause this? If it was 1 user, I would blame them, but there are 3-4 that just started having this problem recently and there are 3-4 that work fine. The PRI is clean, so I can't imagine where the errors are originating. Maybe at the calling CO? Here is some debug info: T1 0/1 is up. (PRI is clean) Applique type is Channelized T1 Cablelength is long gain36 0db Description: XSpedius #1IBRYBRY0361 (800)9espire No alarms detected. alarm-trigger is not set Framing is ESF, Line Code is B8ZS, Clock Source is Line. Data in current interval (474 seconds elapsed): 0 Line Code Violations, 0 Path Code Violations 0 Slip Secs, 0 Fr Loss Secs, 0 Line Err Secs, 0 Degraded Mins 0 Errored Secs, 0 Bursty Err Secs, 0 Severely Err Secs, 0 Unavail Secs Data in Interval 1: 0 Line Code Violations, 0 Path Code Violations 0 Slip Secs, 0 Fr Loss Secs, 0 Line Err Secs, 0 Degraded Mins 0 Errored Secs, 0 Bursty Err Secs, 0 Severely Err Secs, 0 Unavail Secs Data in Interval 2: 0 Line Code Violations, 0 Path Code Violations 0 Slip Secs, 0 Fr Loss Secs, 0 Line Err Secs, 0 Degraded Mins 0 Errored Secs, 0 Bursty Err Secs, 0 Severely Err Secs, 0 Unavail Secs Data in Interval 3: 0 Line Code Violations, 0 Path Code Violations 0 Slip Secs, 0 Fr Loss Secs, 0 Line Err Secs, 0 Degraded Mins 0 Errored Secs, 0 Bursty Err Secs, 0 Severely Err Secs, 0 Unavail Secs Virtual-Access4, bundle name is xxxxxx (This user has trouble) Bundle up for 10:05:19 Dialer interface is Serial0/1:23 9673 lost fragments, 15713 reordered, 2 unassigned 31 discarded, 0 lost received, 1/255 load 0xA354 received sequence, 0xA498 sent sequence Member links: 2 (max not set, min not set) Se0/1:8, since 10:05:19, last rcvd seq 00A353 Se0/1:9, since 10:05:16, last rcvd seq 00A356 GW1#sh int s 0/1:8 Serial0/1:8 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is DSX1 MTU 1500 bytes, BW 64 Kbit, DLY 20000 usec, reliability 157/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255 Encapsulation PPP, loopback not set Keepalive not set LCP Open, multilink Open Last input 00:00:02, output 00:00:00, output hang never Last clearing of "show interface" counters 10:27:22 Input queue: 0/75/12517/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0 Queueing strategy: weighted fair [suspended, using FIFO] FIFO output queue 0/40, 0 drops 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 1 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 14429 packets input, 1016185 bytes, 0 no buffer Received 0 broadcasts, 3169 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles 12517 input errors, 9617 CRC, 2900 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 61 abort 21311 packets output, 1509725 bytes, 0 underruns 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 1 interface resets 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out 1 carrier transitions Timeslot(s) Used:9, Transmitter delay is 0 flags Virtual-Access6, bundle name is yyyyyyy (This user is fine) Bundle up for 10:16:01 Dialer interface is Serial0/1:23 0 lost fragments, 7 reordered, 0 unassigned 0 discarded, 0 lost received, 1/255 load 0xD63F received sequence, 0x1E319 sent sequence Member links: 2 (max not set, min not set) Se0/1:6, since 10:16:01, last rcvd seq 00D63E Se0/1:7, since 10:15:59, last rcvd seq 00D63D GW1#sh int s 0/1:6 Serial0/1:6 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is DSX1 MTU 1500 bytes, BW 64 Kbit, DLY 20000 usec, reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255 Encapsulation PPP, loopback not set Keepalive not set LCP Open, multilink Open Last input 00:16:15, output 00:00:02, output hang never Last clearing of "show interface" counters 10:27:48 Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0 Queueing strategy: weighted fair [suspended, using FIFO] FIFO output queue 0/40, 0 drops 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 29754 packets input, 1540137 bytes, 0 no buffer Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort 64197 packets output, 33275654 bytes, 0 underruns 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 1 interface resets 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out 1 carrier transitions Timeslot(s) Used:7, Transmitter delay is 0 flags From peder@voralt.net Wed May 21 09:49:47 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be mail.angvall.net puck.NOSPAM ([65.205.112.87]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h4LDnlDp022342 for ; Wed, 21 May 2003 09:49:47 -0400 Received: from threebert (unknown [65.205.112.83]) by mail.angvall.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 685CD438A; Wed, 21 May 2003 08:53:35 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <01e801c31f9f$d19e75f0$5370cd41@threebert> From: "Voralt" To: "jc" , References: Subject: Re: [cisco-nas] PRI Problem Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 08:49:37 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300 X-BeenThere: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: list for cisco NAS users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 13:49:48 -0000 > quick glans and my gut tells me one of three problems here (not in any > specific order) > > - telco PRI tests clean and the customers BRI tests clean. > - cpe even the customer line itself (always the same users having the > problem?) Yes. The user can dial in 5 times and hit 5 different channels and they still have the problem. Other users can dial in 5 times, hit 5 different channels and they work fine. > - it could be the modems that they connect too on yourside. Nope, they hit different channels. Also, it's ISDN to a PRI card, we don't have modems. I can't figure it out, it's customer specific to several customers and it just started in the last 24 hours. Other customers work fine. From dpeng@cisco.com Wed May 28 18:53:46 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be sj-core-4.cisco.com puck.NOSPAM (sj-core-4.cisco.com [171.68.223.138]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h4SMrjlb022911 for ; Wed, 28 May 2003 18:53:46 -0400 Received: from sj-cse-320.cisco.com (sj-cse-320.cisco.com [171.69.88.101]) by sj-core-4.cisco.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h4SMrGNb015031; Wed, 28 May 2003 15:53:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from dpeng@localhost) by sj-cse-320.cisco.com (8.11.7+Sun/8.11.6) id h4SMrGj27732; Wed, 28 May 2003 15:53:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 15:53:15 -0700 From: Dennis Peng To: Tassos Chatzithomaoglou Subject: Re: [cisco-nas] ATM/L2TP/PPP MTU question Message-ID: <20030528225315.GB27564@sj-cse-320.cisco.com> References: <3ECB6C8E.8010603@forthnet.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3ECB6C8E.8010603@forthnet.gr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-BeenThere: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: list for cisco NAS users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 22:53:46 -0000 Tassos Chatzithomaoglou [achatz@forthnet.gr] wrote: > > Here is the network diagram: > > DSL ATM ATM ATM ETH > ADSL CPE ----- DSLAM ----- ATM SWITCH ----- BBRAS ----- LNS ----- INTERNET > |-------------- PPPoE/A------------------||----L2TP---| > |----------------------- PPP -------------------------| > > What is the recommended MTU setting for the ip/atm connection between > BBRAS/LNS (default for ATM is 4470), if we have to : > > 1. Do not change anything on user's side > 2. Do not load BBRAS/LNS with extra fragmentation/reassembly > > Should i make it 1540 (1500 + 40 bytes of IP, UDP and L2TP headers) ? Yes, 1540 should do it if you are going Cisco to Cisco. If you are going inter-vendor, it depends on the L2TP header options the other vendor may use (eg. data sequencing would add additional overhead). You may want to increase to 1550 to be safe. Dennis > -- > *********************************** > Chatzithomaoglou Anastasios > Network Design & Operations Center > FORTHnet S.A. > > *********************************** > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nas mailing list > cisco-nas@puck.nether.net > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nas -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- || || Dennis Peng || || Cisco Systems, Inc. Escalation Engineer |||| |||| 170 West Tasman Drive Phone: (408) 526-6143 ..:||||||:..:||||||:.. San Jose, CA 95134 Fax: (408) 232-2343 Cisco Systems Inc. dpeng@cisco.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- From dpeng@cisco.com Wed May 28 18:59:42 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be sj-core-3.cisco.com puck.NOSPAM (sj-core-3.cisco.com [171.68.223.137]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h4SMxflb023181 for ; Wed, 28 May 2003 18:59:42 -0400 Received: from sj-cse-320.cisco.com (sj-cse-320.cisco.com [1