[nsp] ATM encapsulations, which is best

Temkin, David temkin@sig.com
Thu, 21 Nov 2002 11:14:02 -0500


1Mbps in cells per second is approximately 2359cps.

The algorhythm to figure CPS in an almost exact number is to take the kbps
and divide by 424

Ie, a T1 at 1536000bps would be 3622cps

So, no, that's not correct.  Your ISP is trying to hose you.  

Aal5snap is fine.  Aal5ciscoppp just adds overhead you don't need for a
straight IP link unless you need to do TCP or RTP header compression (which
I doubt..)

-Dave

(see
http://www.paradyne.com/technical_manuals/OpenLane_Help/Kbps_to_Cells_Per_Se
cond_Conversion.htm)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: TMS [mailto:tomek@absolut.vinyl.pl] 
> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 12:00 PM
> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: [nsp] ATM encapsulations, which is best
> 
> 
> Hello
> 
> I have connection to my ISP via ATM OC3c fiber optic link. 
> Link capacity is 10Mbps IP.
> 
> My ISP declared that "1Mbps IP = 1100 PCR in Kbps" (vbr-nrt 
> as ATM contract. Is this setting is correct ?
> 
> This ATM/AAL5 encapsulation is best for point-to-point ATM 
> links ? For now I using "aal5snap", but maybe "aal5mux ip" or 
> "aal5ciscoppp" is better for IP link ? Is any good document 
> which describes diffrences between ATM/aal5 encapsulations 
> (aal5snap, aal5mux, aal5ciscoppp) ?
> 
> --
> TMS
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  real_name)s@puck.nether.net 
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-> nsp
> archive at 
> http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 


IMPORTANT:The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is
confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the
sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its
attachments.  Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of
this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly
prohibited.  Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or
should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or
sell any security or other financial instrument.  Neither the sender, his or
her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as
to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein
or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.