[nsp] load balancing bug?

[Stephen J. Wilcox]

just an idea but if you force the active route to be removed does traffic run 
over the other route okay?

> > > fwiw, that didnt work either. its still always using only one path.
> > What are the interfaces for the paths?
> 
> fwiw this was working fine up until a few days ago, then it mysteriously 
> stopped working -- without any configuration changes at all.
> 
> i'm suspecting an IOS bug, but this is a particularly busy core router i 
> am loathe to reboot.
> 
> #sh ip cef 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 det
> 0.0.0.0/0, version 1361, per-destination sharing
> 0 packets, 0 bytes
>   via x.x.110.177, 0 dependencies, recursive
>     traffic share 1
>     next hop x.x.110.177, ATM1/0.4034 via x.x.110.176/30
>     valid adjacency
>   via y.y.180.2, 0 dependencies, recursive
>     traffic share 1
>     next hop y.y.180.2, ATM1/0.4032 via y.y.180.0/30
>     valid adjacency
>   0 packets, 0 bytes switched through the prefix
>   tmstats: external 0 packets, 0 bytes
>            internal 0 packets, 0 bytes
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>