[nsp] 12.2T vs 12.3

Tomas Daniska tomas at tronet.com
Wed Jul 30 16:04:46 EDT 2003


do you do mpls + dot1q?

--

deejay 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: George Stylianou [mailto:georges at is.co.za] 
> Sent: 30. júla 2003 13:01
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: [nsp] 12.2T vs 12.3
> 
> 
> 
> Speaking of 12.2T, 12.2(14)S and 12.3
> 
> Anyone had any issues moving from 12.2T to either one of the above?
> 
> We tried on a 7206 npe-400 with PA-A3-T3 & PA-8T-X21= and had 
> to regress
> to 12.2T 
> 
> We immediately saw a lot of input errors, ignored packets and input
> drops on the FE. I tried switching to the second FE and got the same
> result. This was with both 12.2S and 12.3
> 
> I have a case open for it at the moment but havent got any 
> constructive
> feedback yet, just that the cards arent supported. Im not 
> sure what they
> mean by that as the hardware/software matrix says 12.2S has 
> support for
> the cards and the npe-400.
> 
> We are also running 12.2(14)s on numerous other 7200's 
> npe-300/400/nse-1
> and havent had the same issue.
> 
> Anyone had a similar experience?
> 
> regards
> George
> 
>  
> George Stylianou
> Internet Solutions
> Tel: (+27 11) 575 0465
> Fax: (+27 11) 576 0465
> Cell:(+27 83) 325 6894
> E-mail: georges at is.co.za
> Web: www.is.co.za
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Gert Doering [mailto:gert at greenie.muc.de] 
> > Sent: 30 July 2003 10:05
> > To: Charles Sprickman
> > Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: Re: [nsp] 12.2T vs 12.3
> > 
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 08:24:22PM -0400, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> > > Which is the lesser of those two evils?  There is a ton 
> of junk in 
> > > each of those that I'm sure introduces all sorts of bugs 
> I've never 
> > > even imagined. Which train will receive fixes first, and 
> > which would 
> > > you trust in a production ISP network?
> > 
> > If 12.2S does what you need (haven't checked), I'd go for that.
> > 
> > 12.2(14)S1 and up have the fix for the input-stuck bug, and 
> have been
> > *extremely* well-behaved for everybody I've spoken to (except 
> > Jared, who has broken counters on CT3 interfaces, but 
> > everything else is working).
> > 
> > gert
> > 
> > -- 
> > USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
> >                                                            
> > //www.muc.de/~gert/
> > Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             
> > gert at greenie.muc.de
> > fax: +49-89-35655025                        
> > gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net 
> > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-> nsp
> > archive at 
> > http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> > 
> 
> 
> This email and its content are subject to the disclaimer as 
> displayed at the following link.
> http://www.is.co.za/disc.asp
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 
> 



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list