[c-nsp] Load balancing

[Tantsura, Jeff]

Hi,

I used CSM's on 65xx, work just fine, although there are some tricks,
especially in combination with FW blade.
I've been using Alteon's since 2001, great switch but it's Nortel now...
not my favourite hardware vendor.
You could consider F5 as well.

Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Arie Vayner
Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2004 9:54 AM
To: Michel Renfer; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Load balancing

We are using the CSM for some applications like tunnels, DNS and other
things, and it works just great Arie

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Michel Renfer
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 11:25 PM
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Load balancing

Hi All!

We're currently looking at various load balancing solutions. Any
comments/experiences regarding the Cisco CSS11500 series? Anyone using
SLB on 72xx?

cheers,
michel

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/





_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient,  you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate,  distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this  message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all  copies of this message.