[c-nsp] Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers?

[David J. Hughes]

On 04/06/2005, at 12:16 AM, Pete Templin wrote:

>
> It's not a good compromise.  There are (stupid, IMHO) networks who are
> single-homed to Sprint but run BGP and do NOT have a default route.
> No-export means no-reachy to those networks.

This happened to us recently  (i.e. single homed, non-defaulted network 
didn't get our prefixes due to no-export).  I clearly remember 
wondering at the the time how anyone could be quite that daft.  It 
never ceases to amaze me just how creatively stupid the human brain 
will allow you to be if you try hard enough.


David
...