[c-nsp] Cisco MultiLink PPP

[Lawrence Wong]

--- Jon Lewis <jlewis at lewis.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2005, Dennis Peng wrote:
> 
> > > >> were having.  Am I right in thinking that
> MLPPP avoids the sort of
> > > >> out of order packet arrival that per-packet
> cef load sharing can
> > > >> cause?...while still doing nearly perfect
> load sharing across a
> > > >> number of T1s?
> > > >
> > > > Yes, both true..
> 
> With framentation disabled and Nx
> parrallel/identical T1 circuits in the
> multilink bundle, are those assumptions (really just
> the ordering) still
> [supposed to be] true?
> 
> For the POP I converted, which is now a 4 T1
> multilink group, I'm seeing
> as close to perfect load sharing as can be measured.

Is it a requirement to have N identical links (i.e. 4
x T1) or can I have 1 x T1 + 1 x 512kbps? 



		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - 250MB free storage. Do more. Manage less. 
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250