[c-nsp] IPv6 subnets for point-to-point links

Elmar K. Bins elmi at 4ever.de
Mon May 9 07:47:44 EDT 2005


gert at greenie.muc.de (Gert Doering) wrote:

> On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 01:19:29PM +0200, Frotzler, Florian wrote:
> > To my knowledge there is mostly a consensus within the IETF (and Ripe
> > :-) IPv6 community to not use /127 for various reasons. Personally I
> > agree to that, whether or not this has a technical background, I would
> > never use a /31 in the IPv4 world so why go for a /127.
> 
> In the IPv4 world, /31 is "the way to go" :-)

Tried that, returned to /30 due to problems with static routing.

Elmar.

--

"Begehe nur nicht den Fehler, Meinung durch Sachverstand zu substituieren."
                          (PLemken, <bu6o7e$e6v0p$2 at ID-31.news.uni-berlin.de>)

--------------------------------------------------------------[ ELMI-RIPE ]---



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list