[c-nsp] DRAM for 12.2(18)SXF4

John Neiberger John.Neiberger at efirstbank.com
Mon Apr 3 09:27:06 EDT 2006


I'm referring to the MSFC2. I opened a TAC case on this when I first
began thinking about doing the upgrade because there was some
inconsistent information on CCO. The TAC engineer gave me the impression
that a SUP2/MSFC2 running native IOS uses the MSFC2 DRAM, not the SUP2
DRAM, and that I should be most concerned about how much MSFC2 DRAM I
have. I have no idea how to tell one from the other. If I do a "show
version", is the value being reported the SUP DRAM or MSFC2 DRAM?

Regardless, I'm fairly certain that I have 256MB of DRAM on the SUP2
and 256MB on the MSFC2. The output of "show mem" indicates that I have
about 150MB free at the moment but, again, I don't know if that is SUP2
memory or MSFC2 memory being reported.

Any ideas?

Thanks,
John
--

>>> "Church, Chuck" <cchurch at netcogov.com> 3/31/06 12:54:34 PM >>>
That's good, but are you talking about the DRAM on the sup, or on the
MSFC?  You need 256 on the Sup to run any version of 12.2SX, I
believe.
I don't think anyone has seen a need for more than 256 on the sup, no
matter what features they've been running, or how many views of the
full
table they're taking.  But, 256 on the MSFC may be getting pretty
borderline.  
 
 
Chuck Church
Network Engineer
CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
Netco Government Services
Enterprise Network Engineering
Home Office - 864-335-9473 
Cell - 864-266-3978
cchurch at netcogov.com 
 


-----Original Message-----
From: John Neiberger [mailto:John.Neiberger at efirstbank.com] 
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 1:00 PM
To: Church, Chuck; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net 
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] DRAM for 12.2(18)SXF4

It's the sup2/msfc2. I just talked to my manager about it and he
thinks
we might as well upgrade the DRAM anyway just to future-proof us. Even
if this version doesn't require more than 256MB, it's always possible
that another variation a year from now might.

Thanks,
John
--

>>> "Church, Chuck" <cchurch at netcogov.com> 3/31/06 10:54:04 AM >>>
 
Are you talking about sup memory, or MSFC memory?  Is it the
sup2/msfc2
platform?

Chuck Church
Network Engineer
CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
Netco Government Services
Enterprise Network Engineering
Home Office - 864-335-9473 
Cell - 864-266-3978
cchurch at netcogov.com 

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net 
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of John Neiberger
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 11:37 AM
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net 
Subject: [c-nsp] DRAM for 12.2(18)SXF4

I see that Cisco has now updated IOS Upgrade Planner for this release.
It used to show that 512MB of RAM and 128MB of flash were required. It
now shows 256MB RAM and 32MB flash. I was planning on getting 512MB of
DRAM but now that they've updated the requirements I'm not so sure. I
already have 256MB of DRAM. We're running 12.1E and I have 159MB free.
Do you think I would be fine just staying at 256MB? It sure seems like
I
don't need to go to 512MB now but I don't want to run low.

Any thoughts?

Thanks!
John
--
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp 
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ 

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp 
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ 
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list