[c-nsp] 6500 sup32 v sup720

[Elmar K. Bins]

Hi folks,

peter.salanki at bahnhof.net (Peter Salanki) wrote:

> If you got the same pricing, go with the sup720, but make sure it's  
> sup720-3bxl. For your traffic amount, a sup32 would be enough, but  
> sup720 has a faster CPU which is a key factor when handling full  
> tables (in my opinion, the sup720 CPU could be a LOT faster for that  
> price).

I'd guess SUP32 and SUP720-3B may be equally priced, but Cisco does
the real ripoff [tm] for the XL series...

I have an additional question to the SUP32:
  Does the SUP32 also have the 200-something-K TCAM limit?


Yours,
	Elmi.

-- 

"Hinken ist kein Mangel eines Vergleichs, sondern sollte als wesentliche
 Eigenschaft von Vergleichen angesehen werden."       (Marius Fränzel in desd)

--------------------------------------------------------------[ ELMI-RIPE ]---