[c-nsp] NPE-G1 throughput, with and without L2TP

Church, Chuck cchurch at netcogov.com
Thu May 4 15:15:32 EDT 2006


I'm surprised that no one has mentioned the G2 yet.  Just happened to
notice that earlier while looking for something else... 


Chuck 

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tassos
Chatzithomaoglou
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 12:11 PM
To: Vincent De Keyzer
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] NPE-G1 throughput, with and without L2TP



Vincent De Keyzer wrote on 4/5/2006 18:22:
> Hello,
> 
>  
> 
> imagine a 7200VXR/NPE-G1 with Gig 0/1 aggregating customers, and Gig
0/2
> connected to an IP transit provider. What throughput can I expect
(typical
> Internet traffic): 500 Mbps? More?
> 
>  
> 
> What now it the same traffic is encapsulated into a L2TP tunnel to a
remote
> similar router? By how much will the throughput drop (due to CPU busy
with
> L2TP)?

We get around 180Mbps (x2, coming from one interface and passing through
the 
other) spanning across ~3000 L2TP sessions before maxing (95%) the cpu.
But we 
use netflow+policing on most of these sessions, so we should get more if
we 
disable these.

PS: Still haven't tried MPF ;)

--
Tassos

> 
>  
> 
> Vincent
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list