[c-nsp] [Fwd: Re: QoS possible on the 7600 Sup720-3bxl?]

The Father the_father at allstream.net
Tue May 23 06:08:59 EDT 2006


Chris,

Here's the text from a previous response I sent which has my configs.
Hope you can figure something out from them:

Thanks for the suggestion.  I did something similar to what you wrote
below and here's my config and subsequent error messages:

access-list 76 permit any
access-list 101 permit ip any 192.168.41.0 0.0.0.255
!
class-map match-any all-traffic
description Match all traffic
match access-group 76
!
class-map match-any ACL101
description Match priority block
match access-group 101
!
policy-map test-voice-lan
class ACL101
  set mpls experimental imposition 5
   priority percent 33
class all-traffic
  set mpls experimental imposition 1
   bandwidth percent 66

Trying to apply the policy-map outbound resulted in this error:

7609-lab(config-if)#service-policy output test-voice-lan
%Priority command with parameter not supported on GE-WAN4/1. Please
configure police along with priority to limit the amount of traffic on
priority class
7609-lab(config-if)#

I tried making the config changes as suggested in the error message and
then I got this:

7609-lab(config)#int ge-4/1
7609-lab-hcap(config-if)#service-policy output test-voice-lan
%PRIORITY command with "match access-group" class not supported on
GE-WAN4/1
7609-lab(config-if)#

So I decided to change both queues to CBWFQ and this is what I got:

7609-lab(config)#int ge-4/1
7609-lab(config-if)#service-policy output test-voice-lan
%Weighted Fair Queuing with "match access-group" class not supported on
GE-WAN4/1
7609-lab(config-if)#

It looks like the router doesn't like matching on ACLs for this
particular setup.



Jose



Bisazza, Chris wrote:
> Note that the 7600 is different to standard routers where QoS is
> concerned (it's PFC QoS).
>
> 1. You cannot schedule output based on MPLS e-tags, you can only use the
> 'match mpls experimental' option to apply it to something else. (COS
> comes to mind). Note that setting the priority of a packet will (by
> default) re-write the DSCP values of your packet to match that value
> (unless you configure it otherwise). 
>
> Personally I think it's safer to match the packets you want to modify
> using an ACL (or similar) and set the DSCP values for those packets.
>
>   
>
> 2. 
>   
>> I've recently found out that the 7609 can only match on packet values 
>> that exist before it enters the router.
>>     
>
> not 100% true. Traffic will generally only pass through the PFC once,
> however, which means that you can only do one PFC operation. Setting the
> MPLS e-tag is one such operation. QoS is also applied (separately) on
> output. The PFC operation is different to the queueing function.
>
> Note that the policy-maps (or samples of them) would be useful in
> determining what you're trying to do.
>
> Chris.
>
>
> *************************************************************************************
> The message is intended for the named addressee only and may not be disclosed to or used by anyone else, nor may it be copied in any way. 
>
> The contents of this message and its attachments are confidential and may also be subject to legal privilege.  If you are not the named addressee and/or have received this message in error, please advise us by e-mailing security at colt.net and delete the message and any attachments without retaining any copies. 
>
> Internet communications are not secure and COLT does not accept responsibility for this message, its contents nor responsibility for any viruses. 
>
> No contracts can be created or varied on behalf of COLT Telecommunications, its subsidiaries or affiliates ("COLT") and any other party by email Communications unless expressly agreed in writing with such other party.  
>
> Please note that incoming emails will be automatically scanned to eliminate potential viruses and unsolicited promotional emails. For more information refer to www.colt.net or contact us on +44(0)20 7390 3900.
>
>
>
> __________ NOD32 1.1552 (20060522) Information __________
>
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
>   




More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list