[c-nsp] OT: Check Point v Cisco PIX (ASA 5500 Series)

robbie.jacka at regions.com robbie.jacka at regions.com
Fri Apr 4 11:03:38 EDT 2008


I'd tend to think that it's less about portscans and more about preventing
someone using you to perform a bounced RST flood. Just my 0x2.
--
robbie




                                                                           
             <nick.nauwelaerts                                             
             @thomson.com>                                                 
             Sent by:                                                   To 
             cisco-nsp-bounces         <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>         
             @puck.nether.net                                           cc 
                                                                           
                                                                   Subject 
             04/04/2008 09:55          Re: [c-nsp] OT: Check Point v Cisco 
             AM                        PIX (ASA 5500 Series)               
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           




> -----Original Message-----
> From: A.L.M.Buxey at lboro.ac.uk [mailto:A.L.M.Buxey at lboro.ac.uk]
> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 16:42
> To: Javier Liendo
> Cc: Nauwelaerts, Nick (TCM); cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OT: Check Point v Cisco PIX (ASA 5500 Series)
>
> Hi,
>
> > for a firewall, not sending an RST for a denied connection, isn´t it
> > the "Right Thing" to do?
>
> ah, the perennial DROP or REJECT question.

Yup, I'm for rejecting. It's what applications expect and I still have not
heared any convincing arguments as to why I would want to drop instead. It
seems dropping increases your security in some magical way, but for a well
done portscan dropping isn't even an extra hurdle. All dropping does is
make troubleshooting a pain.

// nick
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/




More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list