[c-nsp] CBWFQ question

Rodney Dunn rodunn at cisco.com
Tue Jul 29 22:57:42 EDT 2008


I've seen it before where it does when the chipset resets
the driver when say the tx ring is adjusted. For
all, that I can remember, we were able to workaround that
to prevent the link flap with some code changes.

Read..ideally we don't want to flap the interface and
cause a reconvergence event for routing.

To expect no packet loss is unrealistic if you have to
reset the tx ring.

Rodney


On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 05:55:05AM +0800, Shaun wrote:
> Does removing or adding CBWFQ on an interface drop the link? Or does it
> depend on traffic levels? Type of interface? I have had opinions both ways.
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list