[c-nsp] Multiple Ethernet links for redundancy

[Mario Spinthiras]

Most beneficial is to port-channel the interfaces. This is clever in many
ways. Handling the interface redundancy any other way complicates things
IMHO. With a port-channel interface you have more bandwidth and redundancy.

Regards,
Mario
http://www.spinthiras.net/

On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Daniel Lacey <daniel_p_lacey at yahoo.com>wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I have a 7206 with two fastethernet port adapters.
> I would like to have both of these run to the 6506 switch.
>
> I need a scenario that would allow one of the links to work if the other
> goes down.
> This is for redundancy and not for bandwidth issues.
>
> I was wondering if it is possible (or desirable) to make them a Multilink
> bundle?
>
> Any other suggestions?
>
> Thanks,
> Dan Lacey
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>