[c-nsp] 7600/SRB4 not sending bgp updates

M Usman Ashraf musmanashraf at gmail.com
Thu Jan 29 13:42:29 EST 2009


Hi,

We had a similar problem on a 7609 box running SRB2. Whenever we used to add
prefixes in a prefix list being advertised to an eBGP peer via a route-map,
soft resetting the peer by "clear ip bgp neighbor  X.X.X.X soft out" used to
result in no prefixes being advertised at all. We had to remove the
route-map configuration and then had to re-enter these configurations to
advertise prefixes again. Upgraded to SRC, and the issue was resolved.

-- 
Regards,

M Usman Ashraf

On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Andrei Radu <andreir at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello everybody,
>
> I've been have a ton of trouble with one of our 7600es (everyone who
> hasn't please stand up :P) used as a border/exchange router. So
> basically this box does OSPF/LDP and iBGP towards the rest of the
> network and eBGP to a number of external peers.
>
> The problem is that for new neighbors configured in a certain
> peer-group the router does not send any updates, although it shows
> prefixes as being advertised in the output of the "show ip bgp
> neighbor A.B.C.D advertised-routes" command. In the output of "show ip
> bgp neighbor A.B.C.D" the update counter remains at a steady 0:
>
>  Message statistics, state Established:
>    InQ depth is 0
>    OutQ depth is 0
>                         Sent       Rcvd
>    Opens:                  1          1
>    Notifications:          0          0
>    Updates:                0         19
>    Keepalives:            30        37
>    Route Refresh:        0          0
>    Total:                    31         57
>
> and the total prefixes remains also at 0:
>
>                                 Sent       Rcvd
>  Prefix activity:               ----       ----
>    Prefixes Current:             504          2 (Consumes 104 bytes)
>    Prefixes Total:                 0          2
>    Implicit Withdraw:            0          0
>    Explicit Withdraw:            0          0
>    Used as bestpath:         n/a          2
>    Used as multipath:         n/a          0
>
> I was able to reproduce this behavior using a bgp session with a test
> router, and also found a workaround: configuring new peers in a
> different peer-group with only the name and the name of the output
> route-map changed, this forced the router to place the new neighbors
> in a different update-group. Everything seemed to work ok until
> earlier today when the workaround peer-group started behaving
> identically :( .
>
> I am sure it is a SRB4 bug and it looks kind of similar to the bgp
> ghost bug seen on the SXH train, my bigger problem is I cannot open a
> TAC case for this box as it is out of smartnet support.
>
> Was anyone else hit by this ?  Does anyone have a more stable
> workaround (short of reloading the box :) ) ? The only thing I could
> find in the bug toolkit was CSCsm57494 which also seems similar but
> does not contain too many details.
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Andrei
>
> "2+2=5, for extremely large values of 2 !"
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list