[c-nsp] IPTV Switch Recommendation

amgnetforums amgnetforums at gmail.com
Wed Jun 10 15:45:45 EDT 2009


Ryan Hughes wrote:
> It "depends" - largely on the type of Multicast you're rolling out.
>
> I had mixed results with 3560's running IP Base versus IP Services for
> SSM/AutoRP roll out. Depending on your requirements you could maybe get IP
> Base to work but best results were with IP Services.
>
> Ryan
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Jeff Kell <jeff-kell at utc.edu> wrote:
>
>   
>> Chris Knipe wrote:
>>     
>>> We're going through the same story at this stage.  Working with allot
>>> of vendors, testing, and trails.  So far for us, a combination of entry
>>> level 2960s and 3560s are working fine.  You are correct, the most
>>> important thing is Multicast and IGMP subscriptions, so pretty much
>>> any half decent switch would be capable.
>>>       
>> Reminds me... do you need the "LAN Base" version to make it fly, or will
>> "LAN Lite" work?
>>
>> (or for the 3560s, IP Base or IP Services?)
>>
>> Jeff
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>   
Hi

We use ME3400 with metro ip access image. ssm works perfect. Have a look 
at the following links for some guidelines.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6902/products_implementation_design_guide_book09186a00806b5b4c.html

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/ps6902/products_implementation_design_guide_book09186a0080665c4c.html

Anthony


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list