[c-nsp] Experience on MPLS-TP (MPLS Transport profile)

[Mark Tinka]

On Sunday 25 April 2010 07:04:45 pm Farhan Jaffer wrote:

> Thanks Mark for the update.
> 
> Let's see how next generation of Transport Networks look
>  like!

It's very different from regular MPLS, with a number of 
features taken out to simplify things the way (I think) 
telco's would prefer them.

Personally, I wouldn't run it, as it's probably easier to 
add OAM capabilities into existing MPLS (but that's likely 
because I'm already happy with IP/MPLS). However, it would 
very appealing to telco's who are hesitant to run packetized 
networks with the exception of Ethernet.

Nonetheless, yes, I'd like to see what it looks like in the 
end (MPLS-TP).

Cheers,

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20100425/59eba254/attachment.bin>