[c-nsp] 6PE: was: mpls over native ipv6?

[Christian MacNevin]

Standard schmandard. What's needed is a business case. 

I've got a fiver. Who wants it? TDPv2 anyone?




-----Original Message-----
From: Mikael Abrahamsson [mailto:swmike at swm.pp.se] 
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 1:47 PM
To: Christian MacNevin
Cc: Tim Durack; Chris Nicholls; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 6PE: was: mpls over native ipv6?

On Thu, 1 Jul 2010, Christian MacNevin wrote:

> Anyone from cisco care to comment on the LDPv6 road map?

Last I checked (couple of months ago) there wasn't even a standard for it, 
I expressed my opinion in the IETF WG IPv6 control plane for MPLS needs 
feature parity with IPv4, and LDPv6 is definitely one of the things needed 
first.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at swm.pp.se