[c-nsp] Basic Etherchannel Question

[Tony Varriale]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Keegan Holley" <keegan.holley at sungard.com>
To: "Cisco NSPs" <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 5:50 PM
Subject: [c-nsp] Basic Etherchannel Question


> Just wondering what the general consensus was on hard coding vs. 
> negotiating
> etherchannels.  I've always hard coded them and viewed the negotiation
> protocols as a possible point of failure.  I was thinking it may be a way 
> to
> diagnose switchport failures that do not cause the link to go down.
> Assuming the contol plane frames will not be sent if the data path goes
> unavailable, it seems like it could be a good way to verify the health of
> the member links.  THoughts?
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

LACP.

tv