[c-nsp] Copper SFP with ME3600X

[Lobo]

Ahhh interesting.  So it looks like the GLC-T is actually NOT supported 
on those two SFP ports according to that matrix.

BTW, this switch's client ports are copper 10/100/1000 RJ-45 so no SFP 
is required on them.  Looks like this particular model number only 
supports the fiber based SFPs.

Thanks!

Jose

On 12/10/2012 2:55 PM, Tóth András wrote:
> GLC-T does not seem to be supported in the SFP+ port, only supported 
> in the client ports.
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modules/transceiver_modules/compatibility/matrix/OL_6981.pdf
>
> If you move the SFP to a client port, does it work?
>
> Andras
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 8:44 PM, Lobo <lobotiger at gmail.com 
> <mailto:lobotiger at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Normally I would agree with this command but it's not supported. 
>     The only "speed" command is nonegotiate and it doesn't make a
>     difference when plugging the SFP in.
>
>     Jose
>
>
>     On 12/10/2012 2:40 PM, Tóth András wrote:
>>     Given that this is a 1G in a 10G port, you might need to add
>>     "speed 1000" to the interface config?
>>
>>     Best regards,
>>     Andras
>>
>>
>>     On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Lobo <lobotiger at gmail.com
>>     <mailto:lobotiger at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>         Hi everyone.  Been having a hard time trying to get a copper
>>         SFP to work on our ME-3600X-24TS-Ms.  According to Cisco
>>         documentation, the GLC-T SFP is supposed to be supported on
>>         one of the fiber ports. However every Cisco SFP we've tried
>>         always spits back an error message:
>>
>>         Switch#
>>
>>         *Dec  6 19:48:30.448: %PHY-4-SFP_NOT_SUPPORTED: The SFP in
>>         Te0/1 is not supported
>>
>>         *Dec  6 19:48:30.448: %PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: gbic-invalid error
>>         detected on Te0/1, putting Te0/1 in err-disable state
>>
>>         Switch#
>>
>>
>>         Has anyone had any success with trying to use these on this
>>         platform?  Fiber based SFPs are fine so long as they're Cisco
>>         branded.  Are there different versions of GLC-T that we may
>>         have the wrong type?
>>
>>         Thanks.
>>
>>         Jose
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>         <mailto:cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
>>         https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>         archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>>
>
>