[c-nsp] inter-VRF routing

Francisco Muniz fmuniz at gmail.com
Wed Feb 8 07:29:17 EST 2012


You could try EVN, which doesn't rely on BGP for route leaking
http://blog.ioshints.info/2012/02/easy-virtual-network-nothing-new-under.html

En Fri, 03 Feb 2012 11:43:04 -0300, Vitkovsky, Adam  
<avitkovsky at emea.att.com> escribió:

> You can use static routes for static inter-vrf routing
> For dynamic inter-vrf redistribution of prefixes you need MP-BGP
>
>
> adam
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net  
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Covalciuc Piotr
> Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 3:00 PM
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] inter-VRF routing
>
> Hello,
>
> I've created multiple VRFs on Cisco 4510. I need to configure the routing
> between VRFs. Cisco recommends using BGP and 'route-target  
> import/export'.
>
> But, my IOS version don't support BGP.
>
> Is it possible to configure the inter-VRF routing using static routes? Or
> maybe there are others solutions?
>
> Thank you,
> Peter
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


-- 
Usando el novísimo cliente de correo de Opera: http://www.opera.com/mail/



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list