[c-nsp] Juniper equivalent for Cisco Cat 6500

[Mark Tinka]

On Wednesday, May 23, 2012 01:00:47 PM Phil Mayers wrote:

> You're probably right, but the N7k is quite close in
> parity to the 6500, in L3VPN-land. L2VPN (I am told)
> should similarly be more or less equivalent to sup2T.
> 
> They're a surprisingly respectable box, and modulo
> "business unit focus" concerns, it's looking difficult
> to justify a Sup2T...

I'm thinking all those other non-MPLS features, e.g., QoS, 
routing, EVC, e.t.c.

Mark.