[c-nsp] Lot of input errors on a NPE-G1 interface

gal.9430 at googlemail.com gal.9430 at googlemail.com
Wed May 23 17:00:14 EDT 2012


> Is this the only traffic going through this 7200?

No. Gi0/1 is connected via 2960G to another router (iBGP). Gi0/2 is
connected to an eBGP peer
who sends a full table.

> How is your scheduler allocate set on the 7200...

Default value, not changed.

> ...have you tried a new cable and cleaning the optics?

New cable: yes
Cleaning the optics: no



On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Sigurbjörn Birkir Lárusson
<sigurbjornl at vodafone.is> wrote:
> Is this the only traffic going through this 7200?
>
> How is your scheduler allocate set on the 7200, have you tried a new cable
> and cleaning the optics?
>
> Kind regards,
> Sibbi
>
> On 23.5.2012 19:33, "gal.9430 at googlemail.com" <gal.9430 at googlemail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>thanks all for the input.
>>
>>Increasing the hold-queue (from default to 100) doesn't seem to help at
>>all:
>>
>>GigabitEthernet0/1 is up, line protocol is up
>>  Hardware is BCM1250 Internal MAC, address is 0006.52f4.d81b (bia
>>0006.52f4.d81b)
>>  Internet address is x.x.x.x/28
>>  MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1000000 Kbit/sec, DLY 10 usec,
>>     reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 2/255
>>  Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
>>  Keepalive set (10 sec)
>>  Full-duplex, 1000Mb/s, link type is autonegotiation, media type is SX
>>  output flow-control is XON, input flow-control is XON
>>  ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
>>  Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:00, output hang never
>>  Last clearing of "show interface" counters 02:17:11
>>  Input queue: 0/100/742/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0
>>  Queueing strategy: fifo
>>  Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
>>  5 minute input rate 10536000 bits/sec, 1824 packets/sec
>>  5 minute output rate 6813000 bits/sec, 2121 packets/sec
>>     11770910 packets input, 2922271410 bytes, 0 no buffer
>>     Received 215 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
>>     341 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 341 overrun, 0 ignored
>>     0 watchdog, 4242 multicast, 0 pause input
>>     0 input packets with dribble condition detected
>>     14975201 packets output, 1820911878 bytes, 0 underruns
>>     0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets
>>     137 unknown protocol drops
>>     0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred
>>     0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier, 0 pause output
>>     0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
>>
>>Will go from 100 to 150 and see whats happen.
>>
>>
>>
>>On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Phil Mayers <p.mayers at imperial.ac.uk>
>>wrote:
>>> On 05/23/2012 08:18 PM, Chris Gotstein wrote:
>>>>
>>>> %Warning: portfast should only be enabled on ports connected to a
>>>>single
>>>> host. Connecting hubs, concentrators, switches, bridges, etcŠ to this
>>>> interface when portfast is enabled, can cause temporary bridging loops.
>>>>
>>>> My understanding of this was a router would be included as well since
>>>> it's used to connect multiple hosts.
>>>
>>>
>>> If you don't enable portfast, you have to suffer the STP state
>>>transitions,
>>> which lead to delays in traffic forwarding after link-up.
>>>
>>> Portfast basically means: "This port is unlikely to be connected to
>>>another
>>> bridge or hub, so skip the LISTENING/LEARNING transitions and jump
>>>straight
>>> to forwarding; if it goes wrong, STP will close the loop shortly."
>>>
>>> It's not magic; and it should be enabled on all host ports. Routers are
>>> hosts, at layer2.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list